RE MARVIN LESLIE GIENGER
The daughter's application was refused because she failed to discharge the burden of showing special circumstances to displace the wife's prior right: the wife's delay was justified by estate duty clearance and practical steps taken, residence abroad or dealings with the estate absent evidence of misconduct do not disqualify, and the daughter lacked evidence of resources or legal aid support to ensure expeditious, economical administration.
- Citation
- RE MARVIN LESLIE GIENGER
- Parties
- Caveator / Applicant to Be Administratrix: Ms. Kris J. Gienger; Person Warning / Respondent / Proposed Administratrix: Madam Chiong Kam Fong; Deceased: Marvin Leslie Gienger
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2007
- Case Number
- HCCA487/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Caveat Proceedings for Grant of Letters of Administration (intestacy) / Summons Under R44 Non Contentious Probate Rules and S36 Probate and Administration Ordinance Heard; Decision Reserved and Handed Down
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; caveat vacated; letters of administration to be granted to Madam Chiong Kam Fong if entitled; costs ordered against the caveator to be taxed; legal aid costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administratrix, Letters of Administration, Caveat, Intestacy, Discretionary Grants, Prior Right Under NCPR, Costs and Legal Aid
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms. Kris J. Gienger
Caveator / Applicant to Be Administratrix
Madam Chiong Kam Fong
Person Warning / Respondent / Proposed Administratrix
Marvin Leslie Gienger
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Caveat Proceedings for Grant of Letters of Administration (intestacy) / Summons Under R44 Non Contentious Probate Rules and S36 Probate and Administration Ordinance Heard; Decision Reserved and Handed Down
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the daughter has shown special circumstances to displace the wife's prior right to the grant under rule 21 NCPR
- 2 Whether the wife's delay in prosecuting the application justified refusing her the grant
- 3 Whether the wife's residence outside Hong Kong or past dealings with the estate render her unsuitable
Ratio Decidendi
The daughter's application was refused because she failed to discharge the burden of showing special circumstances to displace the wife's prior right: the wife's delay was justified by estate duty clearance and practical steps taken, residence abroad or dealings with the estate absent evidence of misconduct do not disqualify, and the daughter lacked evidence of resources or legal aid support to ensure expeditious, economical administration.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; caveat vacated; letters of administration to be granted to Madam Chiong Kam Fong if entitled; costs ordered against the caveator to be taxed; legal aid costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Orders
- Summons filed on 12 July 2006 is dismissed.
- The caveat filed by Ms. Kris J. Gienger on 28 February 2006 shall cease to have effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment