RE BOKEY (P & S) TRADING CO LTD
The court exercised its discretion under Companies Ordinance s200(3) to grant retrospective ratification and sanction payment of Panel B agents' fees out of the assets of the respective companies subject to taxation, because the appointments served the interests of creditors, there was no evidence of conflict or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE BOKEY (P & S) TRADING CO LTD
- Parties
- Applicant and Liquidator: Official Receiver; Company in Liquidation: Newsweb International Limited; Company in Liquidation: China Arts and Crafts Printing Limited; Company in Liquidation: Philma Petroleum Limited; Company in Liquidation: Rich Glory Shipping Limited; Company in Liquidation: Gearland Company Limited; Company in Liquidation: Pan-Win Realty Agency Limited; Company in Liquidation: Pan-Pacific Exhibition Contractors Limited; Company in Liquidation: Best Gain Engineering Limited; Company in Liquidation: T.D.A. Company Limited; Company in Liquidation: Mondial Atelier Garment (Hong Kong) Limited; Company in Liquidation: On Tai Garment Factory Limited; Company in Liquidation: Union Rise Development Limited; Company in Liquidation: Bokey (P & S) Trading Company Limited; Company in Liquidation: Winston Camera & Radio Company Limited; Company in Liquidation: Phantom Records Limited; Company in Liquidation: Frontmax Limited; Company in Liquidation: Bilison (Asia) Limited; Company in Liquidation: Construction & Production Systems Limited; Company in Liquidation: Sun Wing Lee Hing Chan Co Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2007
- Case Number
- HCCW521/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings (summary Liquidations) / Application for Retrospective Ratification of Agent Appointments and Sanction for Payment of Fees; Taxation Hearings Resumed
- Outcome
- Applications granted: court authorised retrospective ratification of the Panel B appointments and sanctioned payment of agents' fees from company assets subject to taxation
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Agents, Retrospective Ratification Under Section 200(3), Delegation of Liquidator's Functions, Taxation of Liquidator/agent Fees, Inherent Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Receiver
Applicant and Liquidator
Newsweb International Limited
Company in Liquidation
China Arts and Crafts Printing Limited
Company in Liquidation
Philma Petroleum Limited
Company in Liquidation
Rich Glory Shipping Limited
Company in Liquidation
Gearland Company Limited
Company in Liquidation
Pan-Win Realty Agency Limited
Company in Liquidation
Pan-Pacific Exhibition Contractors Limited
Company in Liquidation
Best Gain Engineering Limited
Company in Liquidation
T.D.A. Company Limited
Company in Liquidation
Mondial Atelier Garment (Hong Kong) Limited
Company in Liquidation
On Tai Garment Factory Limited
Company in Liquidation
Union Rise Development Limited
Company in Liquidation
Bokey (P & S) Trading Company Limited
Company in Liquidation
Winston Camera & Radio Company Limited
Company in Liquidation
Phantom Records Limited
Company in Liquidation
Frontmax Limited
Company in Liquidation
Bilison (Asia) Limited
Company in Liquidation
Construction & Production Systems Limited
Company in Liquidation
Sun Wing Lee Hing Chan Co Limited
Company in Liquidation
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings (summary Liquidations) / Application for Retrospective Ratification of Agent Appointments and Sanction for Payment of Fees; Taxation Hearings Resumed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Panel B appointments amounted to an impermissible delegation of the Official Receiver's functions as liquidator
- 2 Whether the court can retrospectively ratify those appointments under Companies Ordinance s200(3) or its inherent jurisdiction
- 3 Whether agents' fees can be paid out of the assets of the companies subject to taxation
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under Companies Ordinance s200(3) to grant retrospective ratification and sanction payment of Panel B agents' fees out of the assets of the respective companies subject to taxation, because the appointments served the interests of creditors, there was no evidence of conflict or misconduct, the intended taxation provided independent scrutiny, and it would be disproportionate to investigate delegation in each case individually.
Court Disposition
Applications granted: court authorised retrospective ratification of the Panel B appointments and sanctioned payment of agents' fees from company assets subject to taxation
Orders
- Retrospective authorisation and ratification of the Official Receiver's appointments of Panel B agents in each of the 19 listed cases under Companies Ordinance s200(3) and the court's inherent jurisdiction
- Agents' fees and bills to be taxed by the court in the normal way before any payment from company assets is made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment