RE BEAUTIFUL CORPORATION LTD (In Liquidation)
The judge found that Ms Hua did not comply with the disclosure order of 10 July 2003 and unreasonably refused to cooperate in disposing perishable stock; the second application for provisional liquidators was substantially attributable to her conduct and non-disclosure; accordingly the costs of the petitioner's second application and the Official Receiver's costs for that second application should be borne by Ms Hua, while the Official Receiver's costs for the first application remain payable out of the company's assets.
- Citation
- RE BEAUTIFUL CORPORATION LTD (In Liquidation)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Miss Chan Yuen Fung Dawn; Opposing Contributory / Respondent: Hua Thieu Man Jeannie; Company (in Liquidation): Beautiful Corporation Limited (In Liquidation); Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2004
- Case Number
- HCCW732/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Costs Application Following Appointment of Provisional Liquidators and Winding Up Order
- Outcome
- Costs allocated: petitioner and Official Receiver's costs for the second application to be borne by Ms Hua; Official Receiver's costs for the first application to be paid from company assets; costs to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Provisional Liquidators, Disclosure Obligations, Costs Orders, Disposal of Perishable Stock, Conduct of Contributory
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Chan Yuen Fung Dawn
Petitioner
Hua Thieu Man Jeannie
Opposing Contributory / Respondent
Beautiful Corporation Limited (In Liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Costs Application Following Appointment of Provisional Liquidators and Winding Up Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs of the second ex parte application for appointment of provisional liquidators should be borne by the opposing contributory
- 2 Whether the opposing contributory failed to comply with a disclosure order of 10 July 2003
- 3 Whether the opposing contributory's refusal to cooperate in disposing perishable stock justified a costs order against her
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that Ms Hua did not comply with the disclosure order of 10 July 2003 and unreasonably refused to cooperate in disposing perishable stock; the second application for provisional liquidators was substantially attributable to her conduct and non-disclosure; accordingly the costs of the petitioner's second application and the Official Receiver's costs for that second application should be borne by Ms Hua, while the Official Receiver's costs for the first application remain payable out of the company's assets.
Court Disposition
Costs allocated: petitioner and Official Receiver's costs for the second application to be borne by Ms Hua; Official Receiver's costs for the first application to be paid from company assets; costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- The costs of the petitioner of and occasioned by the application for the appointment of provisional liquidators on 29 August 2003, including the hearing of 14 January 2004, are to be borne by the opposing contributory Ms Hua, to be taxed if not agreed.
- The costs of the Official Receiver of and occasioned by the application for the appointment of provisional liquidators on 10 July 2003 are assessed at HK$9,450.00 and are to be paid out of the assets of the Company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment