張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份相關員工 AND OTHERS v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
Receivers were appointed because plaintiffs demonstrated serious issues to be tried together with clear risk of jeopardy to trust property arising from the trustee's conflicts of interest, alleged misuse of trust funds, and orchestrated intimidation/attempted purchases of beneficiaries' interests; less intrusive remedies were inadequate, potential prejudice to third parties was unproven or speculative, and appointment limited to a block of shares in the holding company was appropriate to preserve the beneficiaries' interests.
- Citation
- 張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份相關員工 AND OTHERS v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicants: Plaintiffs (participating employees); 1st Defendant / Sole Trustee: Mr Caikui Zhang (1st defendant); 2nd Defendant: 2nd defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2015
- Case Number
- HCA2191/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Interlocutory Applications for Receivership and Injunctions / Inter Partes Hearing of Interim Receivership Applications; Reserved Judgment on Injunctions; Interlocutory Orders Made
- Outcome
- Applicants' summonses for appointment of receivers granted in all five actions
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receivers, Interim Preservation of Property, Constructive Trust Vs Discretionary Trusts, Conflict of Interest of Trustee, Shareholder Voting Rights, Intimidation of Beneficiaries, Effect of Receivership on Change of Control Covenants
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs (participating employees)
Applicants
Mr Caikui Zhang (1st defendant)
1st Defendant / Sole Trustee
2nd defendant
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Interlocutory Applications for Receivership and Injunctions / Inter Partes Hearing of Interim Receivership Applications; Reserved Judgment on Injunctions; Interlocutory Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to appoint interim receivers over a block of shares held by the 1st defendant as trustee
- 2 Whether there is sufficient jeopardy to trust property to justify receivership
- 3 Whether damages or less intrusive relief (eg injunction) would be adequate
Ratio Decidendi
Receivers were appointed because plaintiffs demonstrated serious issues to be tried together with clear risk of jeopardy to trust property arising from the trustee's conflicts of interest, alleged misuse of trust funds, and orchestrated intimidation/attempted purchases of beneficiaries' interests; less intrusive remedies were inadequate, potential prejudice to third parties was unproven or speculative, and appointment limited to a block of shares in the holding company was appropriate to preserve the beneficiaries' interests.
Court Disposition
Applicants' summonses for appointment of receivers granted in all five actions
Orders
- Order in terms of the draft minutes of order annexed to the receivership summonses in all 5 actions
- Costs nisi: 1st defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs of the receivership summonses forthwith with certificate for two counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment