CHENG HOI MAN AND OTHERS v. TUNG WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD AND ANOTHER
The court approved the out‑of‑time sanctioned payment and the agreed apportionment because the 4th applicant's evidence established cohabitation and the 3rd applicant unreasonably and repeatedly challenged that status without complying with directions; accordingly costs relating to proving cohabitee status and the costs of the contested hearings are to be borne by the 3rd applicant while respondents pay remaining costs, with taxation if not agreed.
- Citation
- CHENG HOI MAN AND OTHERS v. TUNG WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: CHENG HOI MAN; 2nd Applicant: NG KWAN OI; 3rd Applicant: LAW PUI LING; 4th Applicant: HU XIAOPING; 1st Respondent: TUNG WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: CHUN WO – CRGL JOINT VENTURE
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2014
- Case Number
- DCEC823/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employees' Compensation / Settlement Approval and Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Settlement approved; sanctioned payment of HKD 1,559,040 accepted out of time; apportionment ordered; respondents to pay costs subject to specified exceptions where 3rd applicant bears costs for challenging co‑habitee status and costs of hearings.
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Dependency Award, Co Habitee Entitlement, Sanctioned Payment, Costs Liability, Legal Aid Taxation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHENG HOI MAN
1st Applicant
NG KWAN OI
2nd Applicant
LAW PUI LING
3rd Applicant
HU XIAOPING
4th Applicant
TUNG WO ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
1st Respondent
CHUN WO – CRGL JOINT VENTURE
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees' Compensation / Settlement Approval and Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sanctioned payment could be accepted out of time and settlement approved
- 2 Proper apportionment of sanctioned payment among dependants under Schedule 7, para 6 E.C. Ordinance
- 3 Whether the 4th applicant qualified as a co-habitee and effect of challenge on costs
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the out‑of‑time sanctioned payment and the agreed apportionment because the 4th applicant's evidence established cohabitation and the 3rd applicant unreasonably and repeatedly challenged that status without complying with directions; accordingly costs relating to proving cohabitee status and the costs of the contested hearings are to be borne by the 3rd applicant while respondents pay remaining costs, with taxation if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved; sanctioned payment of HKD 1,559,040 accepted out of time; apportionment ordered; respondents to pay costs subject to specified exceptions where 3rd applicant bears costs for challenging co‑habitee status and costs of hearings.
Orders
- Leave granted to 1st–4th applicants to accept the sanctioned payment of HKD 1,559,040 out of time in full and final settlement
- Leave granted for immediate pay‑out from court: 1st applicant HKD 701,568 (45%); 2nd applicant HKD 155,904 (10%); 3rd applicant HKD 350,784 (22.5%); 4th applicant HKD 350,784 (22.5%)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment