SZE CHE SAU AND OTHERS v. DRAGAGES ET TRAVAUX PUBLICS (HK) LTD AND OTHERS
Court found Ng and Chung & Ng Consulting Engineers Ltd. negligent and in breach of statutory duties for failing to supervise temporary works: falsework lacked required lateral bracing, had missing diagonal braces and did not meet required loading capacity; these failures materially contributed to the collapse. Apportionment of liability fixed at 70% to the principal contractor (D1) and 30% to Ng and CN; CN vicariously liable for acts of Ng and Wong; costs ordered accordingly.
- Citation
- SZE CHE SAU AND OTHERS v. DRAGAGES ET TRAVAUX PUBLICS (HK) LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: SZE CHE SAU; 2nd Plaintiff: YEUNG ON PING; 3rd Plaintiff: SZE KAM SANG; 4th Plaintiff: SZE WAI MING; 5th Plaintiff (administratrix): CHAN SHAN CHU; 6th Plaintiff: 6th Plaintiff; 1st Defendant (principal Contractor): 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant (trading Name): HEE YAU CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (trading); 3rd Defendant: 3rd Defendant; 1st Third Party; Former 4th Defendant: NG KAM TONG; 6th Defendant; 2nd Third Party: CHUNG & NG CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED; 7th Defendant (discontinued): SUN HUNG KAI ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2007
- Case Number
- HCPI433/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Trial on Liability Concluded; Judgment Delivered 19 April 2007
- Outcome
- Liability established: judgment on liability entered against D1 in favour of plaintiffs (by consent); negligence and breaches of statutory duty proven against Ng and CN; contribution ordered and apportionment fixed.
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Liability, Site Safety Supervision, Temporary Works, Breach of Building Ordinance, Duty of Registered Structural Engineer
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZE CHE SAU
1st Plaintiff
YEUNG ON PING
2nd Plaintiff
SZE KAM SANG
3rd Plaintiff
SZE WAI MING
4th Plaintiff
CHAN SHAN CHU
5th Plaintiff (administratrix)
6th Plaintiff
6th Plaintiff
1st Defendant
1st Defendant (principal Contractor)
HEE YAU CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (trading)
2nd Defendant (trading Name)
3rd Defendant
3rd Defendant
NG KAM TONG
1st Third Party; Former 4th Defendant
CHUNG & NG CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
6th Defendant; 2nd Third Party
SUN HUNG KAI ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
7th Defendant (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Trial on Liability Concluded; Judgment Delivered 19 April 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ng and CN were liable in tort to the plaintiffs for negligence and breaches of statutory duty
- 2 If liable, apportionment of liability between the principal contractor (D1) and Ng/CN
- 3 Whether breaches of the Buildings Ordinance, OSHO and Occupiers Liability Ordinance were established
Ratio Decidendi
Court found Ng and Chung & Ng Consulting Engineers Ltd. negligent and in breach of statutory duties for failing to supervise temporary works: falsework lacked required lateral bracing, had missing diagonal braces and did not meet required loading capacity; these failures materially contributed to the collapse. Apportionment of liability fixed at 70% to the principal contractor (D1) and 30% to Ng and CN; CN vicariously liable for acts of Ng and Wong; costs ordered accordingly.
Court Disposition
Liability established: judgment on liability entered against D1 in favour of plaintiffs (by consent); negligence and breaches of statutory duty proven against Ng and CN; contribution ordered and apportionment fixed.
Orders
- Apportion liability: D1 70% and Ng and Chung & Ng Consulting Engineers Ltd. 30%
- Order nisi that costs of D1's contribution and third party proceedings be costs to D1 against Ng and CN
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment