E AND B GIFTWARE INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHU SAU YEE ALAN AND ANOTHER

E AND B GIFTWARE INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHU SAU YEE ALAN AND ANOTHER

The cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are not 'artistic works' under s3(1) of the 1956 Act (not sculptures, engravings or works of artistic craftsmanship); the Plaintiffs own copyright in the technical and rendering drawings and the Defendants' product is a substantial reproduction of those drawings; the 1st Defendant copied and thus infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright and breached his contractual duty of non-disclosure; the 2nd Defendant is secondarily liable because the 1st Defendant's knowledge is attributable to it; UK design registration (Cap.44) does not protect the Defendants in Hong Kong due to prior publication of the Plaintiffs' design.

Citation
E AND B GIFTWARE INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHU SAU YEE ALAN AND ANOTHER
Parties
1st Plaintiff: E & B GIFTWARE INC.; 2nd Plaintiff: TRADEPOWER (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: CHU SAU YEE ALAN; 2nd Defendant: WISE SOURCING COMPANY LIMITED
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
15 May 1987
Case Number
HCA4598/1986
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement / Trial Judgment Delivered 15 May 1987
Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiffs: infringement of copyright in specified drawings and breach of contractual duty of confidence by 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant secondarily liable; declaration under Cap.44 that exclusive design rights not acquired in Hong Kong.
Legal Topics
Artistic Work Definition, Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, Design Registration, Causal Connection/copying
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E & B GIFTWARE INC.

1st Plaintiff

TRADEPOWER (HONG KONG) LIMITED

2nd Plaintiff

CHU SAU YEE ALAN

1st Defendant

WISE SOURCING COMPANY LIMITED

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Copyright Infringement / Trial Judgment Delivered 15 May 1987

  1. 1 Whether cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are "artistic works" under s3(1) of the Copyright Act 1956
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright in technical and rendering drawings
  3. 3 Whether there was causal connection/copying by the 1st Defendant and knowledge by the 2nd Defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are not 'artistic works' under s3(1) of the 1956 Act (not sculptures, engravings or works of artistic craftsmanship); the Plaintiffs own copyright in the technical and rendering drawings and the Defendants' product is a substantial reproduction of those drawings; the 1st Defendant copied and thus infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright and breached his contractual duty of non-disclosure; the 2nd Defendant is secondarily liable because the 1st Defendant's knowledge is attributable to it; UK design registration (Cap.44) does not protect the Defendants in Hong Kong due to prior publication of the Plaintiffs' design.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Plaintiffs: infringement of copyright in specified drawings and breach of contractual duty of confidence by 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant secondarily liable; declaration under Cap.44 that exclusive design rights not acquired in Hong Kong.

Orders

  • Findings of infringement of Plaintiffs' copyright in specified drawings (Layout 1 P8; Layout 2 P9; Overall parts layout P7-1; Upper housing P7-3; Lower housing P7-5; Platform P7-6; Center section P7-7; Platform cover P7-8)
  • Declaration that exclusive privileges and rights under United Kingdom Designs (Protection) Ordinance, Cap.44 have not been acquired in Hong Kong due to prior publication