E AND B GIFTWARE INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHU SAU YEE ALAN AND ANOTHER
The cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are not 'artistic works' under s3(1) of the 1956 Act (not sculptures, engravings or works of artistic craftsmanship); the Plaintiffs own copyright in the technical and rendering drawings and the Defendants' product is a substantial reproduction of those drawings; the 1st Defendant copied and thus infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright and breached his contractual duty of non-disclosure; the 2nd Defendant is secondarily liable because the 1st Defendant's knowledge is attributable to it; UK design registration (Cap.44) does not protect the Defendants in Hong Kong due to prior publication of the Plaintiffs' design.
- Citation
- E AND B GIFTWARE INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHU SAU YEE ALAN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: E & B GIFTWARE INC.; 2nd Plaintiff: TRADEPOWER (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: CHU SAU YEE ALAN; 2nd Defendant: WISE SOURCING COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 1987
- Case Number
- HCA4598/1986
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement / Trial Judgment Delivered 15 May 1987
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs: infringement of copyright in specified drawings and breach of contractual duty of confidence by 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant secondarily liable; declaration under Cap.44 that exclusive design rights not acquired in Hong Kong.
- Legal Topics
- Artistic Work Definition, Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, Design Registration, Causal Connection/copying
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E & B GIFTWARE INC.
1st Plaintiff
TRADEPOWER (HONG KONG) LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
CHU SAU YEE ALAN
1st Defendant
WISE SOURCING COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement / Trial Judgment Delivered 15 May 1987
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are "artistic works" under s3(1) of the Copyright Act 1956
- 2 Whether the Defendants infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright in technical and rendering drawings
- 3 Whether there was causal connection/copying by the 1st Defendant and knowledge by the 2nd Defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The cardboard prototype and plastic mock-ups are not 'artistic works' under s3(1) of the 1956 Act (not sculptures, engravings or works of artistic craftsmanship); the Plaintiffs own copyright in the technical and rendering drawings and the Defendants' product is a substantial reproduction of those drawings; the 1st Defendant copied and thus infringed the Plaintiffs' copyright and breached his contractual duty of non-disclosure; the 2nd Defendant is secondarily liable because the 1st Defendant's knowledge is attributable to it; UK design registration (Cap.44) does not protect the Defendants in Hong Kong due to prior publication of the Plaintiffs' design.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs: infringement of copyright in specified drawings and breach of contractual duty of confidence by 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant secondarily liable; declaration under Cap.44 that exclusive design rights not acquired in Hong Kong.
Orders
- Findings of infringement of Plaintiffs' copyright in specified drawings (Layout 1 P8; Layout 2 P9; Overall parts layout P7-1; Upper housing P7-3; Lower housing P7-5; Platform P7-6; Center section P7-7; Platform cover P7-8)
- Declaration that exclusive privileges and rights under United Kingdom Designs (Protection) Ordinance, Cap.44 have not been acquired in Hong Kong due to prior publication
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment