LILY TSE LAI YIN AND OTHERS v. THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF ALBERT HOUSE AND OTHERS
Damages were quantified on evidence: past loss of dependency for 48 months assessed on deceased's median income and dependency rate (75%), apportioned 80% to husband and 20% to son; statutory bereavement award of $70,000 plus interest awarded; Larco and funeral expenses awarded as conceded; total damages including interest assessed at $800,000 and costs ordered nisi against defendants.
- Citation
- LILY TSE LAI YIN AND OTHERS v. THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF ALBERT HOUSE AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LILY TSE LAI YIN; 2nd Plaintiff: TSUI HO; 3rd Plaintiff: NG PAK MUI; 4th Plaintiff: TSUI WAI NGA by her father and next friend TSUI SIU ON; 5th Plaintiff: CHAN MIN WAH; 6th Plaintiff: LEUNG PUI YING by her father and next friend LEUNG TAI FUK; 7th Plaintiff: TSUI SAI NUI the Administrator of the Estate of MO YEE, deceased; 8th Plaintiff: HO SHIU TAK by his father and next friend HO TUNG SHING; 9th Plaintiff: LEUNG PUI YUK by her father and next friend LEUNG TAI FUK; 1st Defendant: THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF ALBERT HOUSE (also known as THE OWNER INCORPORATION OF ALBERT HOUSE); 2nd Defendant: HOUSING MANAGEMENT AGENCY LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: HO WING HANG; 4th Defendant: NEW BEST RESTAURANT LIMITED; 5th Defendant: ABERDEEN WINNER INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2001
- Case Number
- HCPI828/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries (fatal Accident) / Assessment of Damages (liability Previously Determined)
- Outcome
- Assessment of damages for 7th plaintiff in total of $800,000 awarded; costs order nisi in favour of 7th plaintiff; 7th plaintiff's own costs to be taxed under Legal Aid Regulations.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Dependency, Bereavement, Funeral Expenses, Loss of Accumulation of Wealth, Interest, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LILY TSE LAI YIN
1st Plaintiff
TSUI HO
2nd Plaintiff
NG PAK MUI
3rd Plaintiff
TSUI WAI NGA by her father and next friend TSUI SIU ON
4th Plaintiff
CHAN MIN WAH
5th Plaintiff
LEUNG PUI YING by her father and next friend LEUNG TAI FUK
6th Plaintiff
TSUI SAI NUI the Administrator of the Estate of MO YEE, deceased
7th Plaintiff
HO SHIU TAK by his father and next friend HO TUNG SHING
8th Plaintiff
LEUNG PUI YUK by her father and next friend LEUNG TAI FUK
9th Plaintiff
THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF ALBERT HOUSE (also known as THE OWNER INCORPORATION OF ALBERT HOUSE)
1st Defendant
HOUSING MANAGEMENT AGENCY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
HO WING HANG
3rd Defendant
NEW BEST RESTAURANT LIMITED
4th Defendant
ABERDEEN WINNER INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries (fatal Accident) / Assessment of Damages (liability Previously Determined)
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of past loss of dependency
- 2 Apportionment of dependency between dependents
- 3 Duration of dependency claim
Ratio Decidendi
Damages were quantified on evidence: past loss of dependency for 48 months assessed on deceased's median income and dependency rate (75%), apportioned 80% to husband and 20% to son; statutory bereavement award of $70,000 plus interest awarded; Larco and funeral expenses awarded as conceded; total damages including interest assessed at $800,000 and costs ordered nisi against defendants.
Court Disposition
Assessment of damages for 7th plaintiff in total of $800,000 awarded; costs order nisi in favour of 7th plaintiff; 7th plaintiff's own costs to be taxed under Legal Aid Regulations.
Orders
- Total damages awarded to 7th plaintiff: $800,000 HKD
- Award to Mr Tsui Kwan (husband): $450,827 HKD (comprising loss of dependency including interest $359,565 and bereavement including interest $91,262)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment