SUN LEGEND INVESTMENTS LTD v. HO YUK WAH, DAVID AND OTHERS
Sun Legend, as assignee, could not be made liable on the Firm's counterclaim absent an equitable burden or an assignee's assumption of liability; substitution by procedure did not change substantive law; accordingly Sun Legend entitled to judgment on the counterclaim but costs are limited to pre-trial procedural steps, and NWD's costs on the counterclaims are limited to 20% to reflect its proportion of liability and trial time.
- Citation
- SUN LEGEND INVESTMENTS LTD v. HO YUK WAH, DAVID AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca1212); Assignee of Original Plaintiffs (dongguan): Sun Legend Investments Limited; Defendant by Counterclaim (hca1212 & Hca2915); Interested Corporate Party: New World Development Co Ltd; Plaintiff (hca2915); Original Developer Claimant: Beijing Chongwen-New World Properties Development Company Limited; Plaintiff (hca2915); Original Developer Claimant: China New World Electronics Limited; 1st Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 1st Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Ho Yuk Wah, David; 2nd Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 2nd Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Ho Yuk Kuen, Jade; 3rd Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 3rd Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Chan Man Ho, Brian; 4th Defendant (hca1212); 4th Plaintiff by Counterclaim; Solicitors Who Applied Set Off: David Y W Ho & Co (a Firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2010
- Case Number
- HCA1212/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Actions for Recovery of Sums and Counterclaims for Solicitors' Fees / Decision on Costs (post Trial)
- Outcome
- Costs orders nisi made absolute with specific apportionments: Firm awarded costs on claim; Sun Legend awarded limited costs on counterclaim; NWD awarded 20% of counterclaim costs.
- Legal Topics
- Assignment, Counterclaim, Set Off, Substitution of Parties, Solicitors Accounts Rules
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sun Legend Investments Limited
Plaintiff (hca1212); Assignee of Original Plaintiffs (dongguan)
New World Development Co Ltd
Defendant by Counterclaim (hca1212 & Hca2915); Interested Corporate Party
Beijing Chongwen-New World Properties Development Company Limited
Plaintiff (hca2915); Original Developer Claimant
China New World Electronics Limited
Plaintiff (hca2915); Original Developer Claimant
Ho Yuk Wah, David
1st Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 1st Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Ho Yuk Kuen, Jade
2nd Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 2nd Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Chan Man Ho, Brian
3rd Defendant (hca1212 & Hca2915); 3rd Plaintiff by Counterclaim
David Y W Ho & Co (a Firm)
4th Defendant (hca1212); 4th Plaintiff by Counterclaim; Solicitors Who Applied Set Off
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions for Recovery of Sums and Counterclaims for Solicitors' Fees / Decision on Costs (post Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assignee (Sun Legend) is liable on a counterclaim for debts of the assignor
- 2 Whether substitution of parties under O 15 r 7 renders an assignee liable for burdens of the assignor
- 3 Whether costs on counterclaims should be apportioned between NWD and the Firm and on what basis
Ratio Decidendi
Sun Legend, as assignee, could not be made liable on the Firm's counterclaim absent an equitable burden or an assignee's assumption of liability; substitution by procedure did not change substantive law; accordingly Sun Legend entitled to judgment on the counterclaim but costs are limited to pre-trial procedural steps, and NWD's costs on the counterclaims are limited to 20% to reflect its proportion of liability and trial time.
Court Disposition
Costs orders nisi made absolute with specific apportionments: Firm awarded costs on claim; Sun Legend awarded limited costs on counterclaim; NWD awarded 20% of counterclaim costs.
Orders
- The Firm to have its costs of both actions on a party and party basis (costs on the claim).
- Sun Legend entitled to judgment on the counterclaim in the Dongguan action and is entitled to costs of the counterclaim only to the date upon which the defendant's Hearsay Notice was filed; those costs to be taxed on a party and party basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment