Re Yeung Kwok Lai

Re Yeung Kwok Lai

The Official Receiver proved the specified statutory grounds: the bankrupt repeatedly failed to co-operate, failed to submit required statements and annual reports, failed to resign as director, and engaged in conduct inconsistent with bankruptcy; these failures prejudiced creditors and prevented proper administration, therefore suspension of the automatic discharge for the maximum statutory period of four years was warranted and costs were awarded to the Official Receiver.

Citation
Re Yeung Kwok Lai
Parties
Bankrupt: Yeung Kwok Lai; Official Receiver (applicant and Trustee): The Official Receiver
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
10 January 2003
Case Number
HCB813/1998
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application Objecting to Automatic Discharge Under Section 30 A; Hearing and Determination
Outcome
Automatic discharge suspended for four years; bankrupt not discharged until 14 October 2006; costs awarded to the Official Receiver.
Legal Topics
Automatic Discharge, Suspension of Discharge, Co Operation With Trustee, Director Resignation, Annual/anniversary Reports, Costs Assessment
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yeung Kwok Lai

Bankrupt

The Official Receiver

Official Receiver (applicant and Trustee)

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application Objecting to Automatic Discharge Under Section 30 A; Hearing and Determination

  1. 1 Whether grounds under section 30A(4)(c),(d) and (h) established to justify suspension of automatic discharge
  2. 2 Appropriate length of suspension (up to 4 years)
  3. 3 Whether the bankrupt's conduct prejudiced creditors and warrants in-depth investigation

Ratio Decidendi

The Official Receiver proved the specified statutory grounds: the bankrupt repeatedly failed to co-operate, failed to submit required statements and annual reports, failed to resign as director, and engaged in conduct inconsistent with bankruptcy; these failures prejudiced creditors and prevented proper administration, therefore suspension of the automatic discharge for the maximum statutory period of four years was warranted and costs were awarded to the Official Receiver.

Court Disposition

Automatic discharge suspended for four years; bankrupt not discharged until 14 October 2006; costs awarded to the Official Receiver.

Orders

  • Automatic discharge of the bankrupt suspended for a period of 4 years so that the bankrupt shall not be discharged until 14 October 2006.
  • The costs of the application are to be paid by the Bankrupt to the Official Receiver.