RE CHU YING KIN
The court found on balance that the bankrupt wilfully failed to disclose multiple assets/claims (registered trademarks, a substantial ongoing PRC property claim, shareholdings) and was evasive with the Official Receiver, thereby establishing grounds (c) (failure to co-operate) and (d) (unsatisfactory conduct) under s30A(4). Given the duty to disclose, the OR's need to investigate and the aims of rehabilitation balanced against commercial morality, the court exercised its discretion to suspend the Relevant Period. The Time Summons was retrospectively granted. The suspension was set at one year and nine months starting 31 July 2021 to allow the OR to complete inquiries and protect...
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 680
- Parties
- Creditor/applicant: Chu Chi Keung; Trustee in Bankruptcy: Official Receiver; Bankrupt: Chu Ying Kin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2023
- Case Number
- HCB4013/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application to Suspend Automatic Discharge / Application Hearing and Decision on Extension of Relevant Period and Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Time Summons granted retrospectively; objections under s30A(4)(c) and (d) established; Relevant Period suspended; bankruptcy extended; costs largely neutral between parties with OR costs payable from estate subject to assessment
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Discharge, Suspension of Discharge, Non Disclosure of Assets, Failure to Cooperate With Trustee, Time Extension for Service, Foreign Proceedings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chu Chi Keung
Creditor/applicant
Official Receiver
Trustee in Bankruptcy
Chu Ying Kin
Bankrupt
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application to Suspend Automatic Discharge / Application Hearing and Decision on Extension of Relevant Period and Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Time Summons to permit late service should be granted
- 2 Whether grounds under section 30A(4) BO (failure to co-operate; unsatisfactory conduct) are established
- 3 Whether, in the exercise of the court's discretion, the automatic discharge should be suspended and for what period
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on balance that the bankrupt wilfully failed to disclose multiple assets/claims (registered trademarks, a substantial ongoing PRC property claim, shareholdings) and was evasive with the Official Receiver, thereby establishing grounds (c) (failure to co-operate) and (d) (unsatisfactory conduct) under s30A(4). Given the duty to disclose, the OR's need to investigate and the aims of rehabilitation balanced against commercial morality, the court exercised its discretion to suspend the Relevant Period. The Time Summons was retrospectively granted. The suspension was set at one year and nine months starting 31 July 2021 to allow the OR to complete inquiries and protect...
Court Disposition
Time Summons granted retrospectively; objections under s30A(4)(c) and (d) established; Relevant Period suspended; bankruptcy extended; costs largely neutral between parties with OR costs payable from estate subject to assessment
Orders
- Retrospectively abridge time for service and allow service of CCK-1 on 22 July 2021
- Relevant Period for automatic discharge shall cease to run for one year and nine months commencing from 31 July 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment