RE: TSE SHEUNG YAN and EX PARTE: CHEKIANG FIRST BANK LTD.
The court found the Debtors' account of a binding agreement unreliable against contemporaneous bank records and credible bank witness evidence; the conditional concessions required surrender by 17 August 1999 which did not occur, and even if there had been an agreement it would lack fresh consideration under the preferred authority Re Selectmove. The alleged undervalue sale did not prima facie exceed the unsecured debt such as to prevent bankruptcy orders. Accordingly bankruptcy orders were made against both Debtors.
- Citation
- RE: TSE SHEUNG YAN and EX PARTE: CHEKIANG FIRST BANK LTD.
- Parties
- Petitioner / Judgment Creditor: Chekiang First Bank Limited; Debtor / Respondent: Tse Sheung Yan; Debtor / Respondent: Lam Yuk Ha; Official Receiver (attendance Excused): Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2000
- Case Number
- HCB62/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Hearing and Judgment (bankruptcy Orders Made)
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy orders made against Mr Tse Sheung Yan and Ms Lam Yuk Ha; costs ordered nisi to the Petitioner
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Order, Power of Sale by Mortgagee, Variation of Contract, Consideration, Undervalue Sale, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chekiang First Bank Limited
Petitioner / Judgment Creditor
Tse Sheung Yan
Debtor / Respondent
Lam Yuk Ha
Debtor / Respondent
Official Receiver
Official Receiver (attendance Excused)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Hearing and Judgment (bankruptcy Orders Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a binding agreement between the Bank and the Debtors varying repayment terms and conditioning concessions on surrender of possession
- 2 Whether any such agreement was supported by consideration or was merely performance of an existing obligation
- 3 Whether the Bank sold the Property at an undervalue so as to give the Debtors a viable claim to defeat bankruptcy
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the Debtors' account of a binding agreement unreliable against contemporaneous bank records and credible bank witness evidence; the conditional concessions required surrender by 17 August 1999 which did not occur, and even if there had been an agreement it would lack fresh consideration under the preferred authority Re Selectmove. The alleged undervalue sale did not prima facie exceed the unsecured debt such as to prevent bankruptcy orders. Accordingly bankruptcy orders were made against both Debtors.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy orders made against Mr Tse Sheung Yan and Ms Lam Yuk Ha; costs ordered nisi to the Petitioner
Orders
- Bankruptcy order made on each petition presented against Tse Sheung Yan and Lam Yuk Ha
- Order nisi that the Petitioner (Chekiang First Bank Limited) is to have the costs of the Petitions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment