HKSAR v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO

HKSAR v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO

The 10 month immediate custodial sentence was within lawful discretion because the magistrate reasonably selected a starting point (about 16 months) for a theft affecting a tourist, applied a plea discount, and correctly prioritized deterrence and protection of tourism; there is no reason to disturb the sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HKSAR v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: Basa Alejandro Sarmiento
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 December 1997
Case Number
HCMA947/1997
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment Entered
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; sentence of 10 months imprisonment upheld
Legal Topics
Theft, Sentencing Guidelines, Deterrence, Plea Discount, Aggravating Factors
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Theft Sentencing Guidelines Deterrence Plea Discount Aggravating Factors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

Basa Alejandro Sarmiento

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment Entered

  1. 1 Whether the 10 month custodial sentence for theft was excessive
  2. 2 Application of pickpocketing sentencing guidelines to theft involving a tourist
  3. 3 Proper weight to give deterrence and plea discount

Ratio Decidendi

The 10 month immediate custodial sentence was within lawful discretion because the magistrate reasonably selected a starting point (about 16 months) for a theft affecting a tourist, applied a plea discount, and correctly prioritized deterrence and protection of tourism; there is no reason to disturb the sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; sentence of 10 months imprisonment upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Sentence of 10 months imprisonment affirmed