HKSAR v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO
The 10 month immediate custodial sentence was within lawful discretion because the magistrate reasonably selected a starting point (about 16 months) for a theft affecting a tourist, applied a plea discount, and correctly prioritized deterrence and protection of tourism; there is no reason to disturb the sentence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO
- Parties
- Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: Basa Alejandro Sarmiento
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1997
- Case Number
- HCMA947/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment Entered
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; sentence of 10 months imprisonment upheld
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Sentencing Guidelines, Deterrence, Plea Discount, Aggravating Factors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HKSAR
Respondent
Basa Alejandro Sarmiento
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment Entered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 10 month custodial sentence for theft was excessive
- 2 Application of pickpocketing sentencing guidelines to theft involving a tourist
- 3 Proper weight to give deterrence and plea discount
Ratio Decidendi
The 10 month immediate custodial sentence was within lawful discretion because the magistrate reasonably selected a starting point (about 16 months) for a theft affecting a tourist, applied a plea discount, and correctly prioritized deterrence and protection of tourism; there is no reason to disturb the sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; sentence of 10 months imprisonment upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Sentence of 10 months imprisonment affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 947 OF 1997 ____________ BETWEEN HKSAR Respondent v. BASA ALEJANDRO SARMIENTO Appellant ____________ Coram: The Honourable Madam Justice Beeson in Court Date of Hearing: 16th December 1997 Date of Judgment: 16th December 1997 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ The Defendant appeals against the sentences imposed on him for conviction of theft. The theft related to the stealing of a rucksack from a passenger at the airport; the rucksack contained property valued at approximately $23,000.00. The Defendant was caught by an observant patron of the restaurant where the theft took place, and a police officer, who was alerted to the theft, helped in the apprehension. It was found that the Defendant had arrived as a visitor on the 4th September 1997 and this offence was committed on the 19th September 1997. The Defendant entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment. In his reasons for sentence, the magistrate took the view that this was more serious than an ordinary pickpocketing case both because of its damage to the reputation of Hong Kong as a tourist destination and also because of the inconvenience, delay and loss of valuable documents and items, that might be occasioned to any traveller affected by a theft of this nature. In considering the guidelines the magistrate had in mind the pickpocketing guidelines which are 6 to 9 months on a plea and 15 months after trial. He considered that the events warranted an immediate custodial sentence, even although the defendant is a first offender in Hong Kong. I agree with the magistrate s conclusion that, it is important to have deterrence as a main consideration in a sentence of this nature. The magistrate appears to have taken as the sentence starting point about 16 months and after discount for plea given a sentence of 10 months. I see no reason at all to disturb what is an entirely proper sentence for this offence. The appeal is dismissed. (C. M. Beeson) Judge of the Court of First Instance Ms. Alice Chan, Government Counsel for D.P.P. Basa Alejandro Sarmiento, Appellant, in person. - PAGE - @HP DeskJet 660C LPT1: winspool HP DeskJet 660C HP DeskJet 660C HP DeskJet 660C PoolA/Karen Normal iris Microsoft Word 8.0 Juidiciary Title _PID_GUID Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8