BEGUM SHULI v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
Short delay of four days, combined with the Board's findings that the applicant's non-refoulement claim was unsubstantiated, that she had admitted coming to Hong Kong for employment and that state protection and internal relocation were reasonable alternatives, meant there was no realistic prospect of success;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1367
- Parties
- Applicant: Begum Shuli; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2023
- Case Number
- HCAL739/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review/extension of Time Application / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Extension of time refused; application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Credibility Assessment, State Protection and Internal Relocation, Prospect of Success
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Begum Shuli
Applicant
Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent
Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review/extension of Time Application / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time should be granted for filing the leave application
- 2 Whether the applicant's non-refoulement claim has a realistic prospect of success
- 3 Whether state protection and internal relocation were reasonably available to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
Short delay of four days, combined with the Board's findings that the applicant's non-refoulement claim was unsubstantiated, that she had admitted coming to Hong Kong for employment and that state protection and internal relocation were reasonable alternatives, meant there was no realistic prospect of success; therefore extension of time was refused and the application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Extension of time refused; application dismissed
Orders
- Extension of time refused
- Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj HCAL 739/2019 [2023] HKCFI 1367 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST 739 OF 2019 _____________ BETWEEN Begum Shuli Applicant Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office Putative Respondent Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party _____________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung in Chambers Date of Decision: 6 June 2023 D E C I S I O N The application The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and she lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration ( the Director ). The Director rejected her application and she appealed to the Torture Claims Appeal Board ( the Board ). Having considered her evidence, the Board, by its Decision ( the Board s Decision ), rejected her appeal and affirmed the Director s Decision. Pursuant to Order 53, rule 3(2) of the Rules of the High Court ( ), the applicant filed Form No. 86 to apply for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board s Decision. By Order dated 20 April 2023 ( the Court s decision ), the Court dismissed her application for the reason that there was no realistic prospect of success in her intended application. In her affirmation filed on 9 May 2023, the applicant said that she received the Court s decision on 4 May 2023; that she is not well-educated and that she has no money to employ a solicitor. Discussion Pursuant to Order 32, rule 11 and 11A of the RHC, having considered the applicant s reason, I decide to determine this application on paper without an oral hearing. The Court shall consider the factors as set out in AW v. Director of Immigration and William Lam [2016] 2 HKC 393 at para. 27(3) in considering if extension of time should be extended: (1) the length of delay; (2) the reasons for the delay; (3) the prospect of the intended appeal; and (4) the prejudice to the putative respondent if extension of time was granted. The deadline for her appeal is 5 May 2023. The applicant is late for only 4 days. I shall consider the merits of her case. In Re Adumekwe Rowland Ejike [2019] HKCA 702, the Court of Appeal held: 19. The prospect of success of the intended appeal is important: the court will not grant extension for a hopeless appeal to be pursued, see Re Rahman Wasif [2019] HKCA 299 at [13]; Re Kpamou Gbotoi Bernard [2019] HKCA 168; and Re Irshad Muhammad [2018] HKCA 864 at [16]. The applicant s claim was made on the basis that, if refouled, she would be harmed or killed by members of the Awami League. The Director of Immigration refused her application for the reason that her claim was not substantiated. She appealed to the Board. Having considered the evidence, the Board considered that she admitted that she came to Hong Kong for employment and state protection would be available to her and internal relocation was a reasonable alternative. The applicant has not been able to raise any valid ground to challenge the Board s Decision. There is not any realistic prospect of success in her intended appeal. In the circumstances, I refuse to extend time for her appeal. Accordingly, I dismiss her application. (K. W. Lung) Deputy High Court Judge The applicant was unrepresented. PAGE - A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hCkE hCkE h N hCkE gdna$ gdna$ gdCkE gdCkE gdX3 hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ hna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdna$ gdj& gd# gdna$ gd# }yoio^oW h9ie h9ie h9ie h9ie h9ie h9ie h9ie h9ie :pwV [Content_Types].xml _rels/.rels theme/theme/themeManager.xml K Y, sQ}# theme/theme/theme1.xml $O}) Xp90 +PHI| PP yu 9xu5 fs+W VF7H q=. 8}d- qyI@ j!Q_ jyV` |PZ+ T ""p < 4V O&x$ A8>v ;EUC n 8r *~P(5 .}x E /,EE\} theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels 5 6?$Q K(M&$R(.1 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/> &tBL Ukb; Ukb; F?lH _V5i HCSD 17/2012 High Court CACC 283-2007.dot Windows User Microsoft Office Word Times New Roman Times New Roman Times New Roman Times New Roman Times New Roman /201 [202 ] HKCFI 1367 Times New Roman IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST ______ _____ BETWEEN Times New Roman Begum Shuli Applicant Torture C laims Appeal Board refoulement Claims Petition Office Putative Respondent Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party _______ ____ Before: Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung Chambers Date of Decision June D E C I S I O N Times New Roman The application "Arial The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and she lodged a non refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration ( the Director ). The Director rejected her "System Judiciary Hong Kong HCSD 17/2012 Title <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><b:Sources SelectedStyle="\APA.XSL" StyleName="APA" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"></b:Sources> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <ds:datastoreItem ds:itemID="{28D93D7A-EE38-48CA-B1E6-A70B8041ED35}" xmlns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"><ds:schemaRefs><ds:schemaRef ds:uri="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"/></ds:schemaRefs></ds:datastoreItem> Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8