THE QUEEN v. TANG TAK MING

THE QUEEN v. TANG TAK MING

The appeal was dismissed because the magistrate was not disqualified by prior knowledge he had treated as equivalent to an opening statement, the police witness's testimony on obvious betting notations did not require expert qualification, and the totality of admissions, telephone calls and exhibits permitted the reasonable inference that the appellant was engaging in book-making in the course of trade or business.

Citation
THE QUEEN v. TANG TAK MING
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: Tang Tak-ming; Second Defendant: Chau Sai-lung
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
12 October 1988
Case Number
HCMA760/1988
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Criminal Appeal to High Court (appellate Jurisdiction) / Hearing and Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and magistrate's decision upheld.
Legal Topics
Book Making, Disqualification of Judge/magistrate, Expert Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence and Inferences, Aiding and Abetting
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Gambling Law Evidence Law Procedural Law Book Making Disqualification of Judge/magistrate Expert Evidence Circumstantial Evidence and Inferences +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Tang Tak-ming

Appellant/defendant

Chau Sai-lung

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Criminal Appeal to High Court (appellate Jurisdiction) / Hearing and Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the magistrate should have disqualified himself for prior knowledge of related proceedings
  2. 2 Whether a police witness should have been treated as an expert before giving evidence on documentary betting notations
  3. 3 Whether the magistrate applied the correct test when drawing adverse inferences and concluding the appellant acted in the course of trade or business (book-making)

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the magistrate was not disqualified by prior knowledge he had treated as equivalent to an opening statement, the police witness's testimony on obvious betting notations did not require expert qualification, and the totality of admissions, telephone calls and exhibits permitted the reasonable inference that the appellant was engaging in book-making in the course of trade or business.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and magistrate's decision upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Conviction of book-making under Gambling Ordinance upheld