AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHAMP FAIR MANUFACTORY CO. LTD.

AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHAMP FAIR MANUFACTORY CO. LTD.

On the balance of probabilities the court found Champ Fair supplied defective goods in the 1991 and 1992 seasons causing quantifiable losses; Champ Fair was entitled to judgment on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices of HK$1,403,474.30 but the plaintiffs were entitled to set-off for defective goods and associated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHAMP FAIR MANUFACTORY CO. LTD.
Parties
1st Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 2nd Plaintiff (hca4819/1992): Greyland Trading Limited; 2nd Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 1st Plaintiff (hca4819/1992): Aqua-Leisure Industries Inc.; 1st Defendant (hca8833/1991): Lau Chun Ming Stephen; 2nd Defendant (hca8833/1991): Funmakers International Limited; 3rd Defendant (hca8833/1991): Lo Shing Ching; Defendant (hca4819/1992): Champ Fair Manufactory Co. Ltd.
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 May 2001
Case Number
HCA4819/1992
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Commercial Action for Breach of Contract, Injunctions and Damages / Judgment on Liability for Defective Goods, Assessment of Damages and Counterclaims (final Judgment)
Outcome
Judgment entered: defendant (Champ Fair) entitled to HK$1,403,474.30 on counterclaim but plaintiffs entitled to set-off for defective goods (US$79,912.31 for 1991 and US$129,192.97 for 1992) resulting in a net judgment in plaintiffs' favour; costs to plaintiffs; interest at prime+1% on final balance from date of...
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement, Damages, Set Off, Limitation (time Bar), Anton Piller Order, Evidence and Witness Credibility, Injunctions
Source Language
en
Contract Law Commercial Law Civil Procedure Equity (injunctions) Breach of Contract Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement Damages Set Off +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Greyland Trading Limited

1st Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 2nd Plaintiff (hca4819/1992)

Aqua-Leisure Industries Inc.

2nd Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 1st Plaintiff (hca4819/1992)

Lau Chun Ming Stephen

1st Defendant (hca8833/1991)

Funmakers International Limited

2nd Defendant (hca8833/1991)

Lo Shing Ching

3rd Defendant (hca8833/1991)

Champ Fair Manufactory Co. Ltd.

Defendant (hca4819/1992)

Procedural Posture

Consolidated Commercial Action for Breach of Contract, Injunctions and Damages / Judgment on Liability for Defective Goods, Assessment of Damages and Counterclaims (final Judgment)

  1. 1 Whether Champ Fair supplied defective goods to the plaintiffs
  2. 2 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to damages for defective goods and the correct measure of those damages
  3. 3 Whether parts of the plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and effect of limitation on available relief

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities the court found Champ Fair supplied defective goods in the 1991 and 1992 seasons causing quantifiable losses; Champ Fair was entitled to judgment on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices of HK$1,403,474.30 but the plaintiffs were entitled to set-off for defective goods and associated costs of US$79,912.31 (1991) and US$129,192.97 (1992), resulting in a final balance in favour of the plaintiffs; 1991 claims could be relied upon as set-off despite limitation; interest ordered at prime rate plus 1% on the final balance from the date of the writ to judgment; costs awarded to the plaintiffs (nisi) to be taxed if not agreed.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered: defendant (Champ Fair) entitled to HK$1,403,474.30 on counterclaim but plaintiffs entitled to set-off for defective goods (US$79,912.31 for 1991 and US$129,192.97 for 1992) resulting in a net judgment in plaintiffs' favour; costs to plaintiffs; interest at prime+1% on final balance from date of...

Orders

  • Judgment for Champ Fair on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices in the sum of HK$1,403,474.30
  • Set-off allowed to plaintiffs: US$79,912.31 (1991 defective goods and associated costs) against the counterclaim