AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHAMP FAIR MANUFACTORY CO. LTD.
On the balance of probabilities the court found Champ Fair supplied defective goods in the 1991 and 1992 seasons causing quantifiable losses; Champ Fair was entitled to judgment on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices of HK$1,403,474.30 but the plaintiffs were entitled to set-off for defective goods and associated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. CHAMP FAIR MANUFACTORY CO. LTD.
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 2nd Plaintiff (hca4819/1992): Greyland Trading Limited; 2nd Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 1st Plaintiff (hca4819/1992): Aqua-Leisure Industries Inc.; 1st Defendant (hca8833/1991): Lau Chun Ming Stephen; 2nd Defendant (hca8833/1991): Funmakers International Limited; 3rd Defendant (hca8833/1991): Lo Shing Ching; Defendant (hca4819/1992): Champ Fair Manufactory Co. Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2001
- Case Number
- HCA4819/1992
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Commercial Action for Breach of Contract, Injunctions and Damages / Judgment on Liability for Defective Goods, Assessment of Damages and Counterclaims (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Judgment entered: defendant (Champ Fair) entitled to HK$1,403,474.30 on counterclaim but plaintiffs entitled to set-off for defective goods (US$79,912.31 for 1991 and US$129,192.97 for 1992) resulting in a net judgment in plaintiffs' favour; costs to plaintiffs; interest at prime+1% on final balance from date of...
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement, Damages, Set Off, Limitation (time Bar), Anton Piller Order, Evidence and Witness Credibility, Injunctions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greyland Trading Limited
1st Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 2nd Plaintiff (hca4819/1992)
Aqua-Leisure Industries Inc.
2nd Plaintiff (hca8833/1991); 1st Plaintiff (hca4819/1992)
Lau Chun Ming Stephen
1st Defendant (hca8833/1991)
Funmakers International Limited
2nd Defendant (hca8833/1991)
Lo Shing Ching
3rd Defendant (hca8833/1991)
Champ Fair Manufactory Co. Ltd.
Defendant (hca4819/1992)
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Commercial Action for Breach of Contract, Injunctions and Damages / Judgment on Liability for Defective Goods, Assessment of Damages and Counterclaims (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Champ Fair supplied defective goods to the plaintiffs
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to damages for defective goods and the correct measure of those damages
- 3 Whether parts of the plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and effect of limitation on available relief
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found Champ Fair supplied defective goods in the 1991 and 1992 seasons causing quantifiable losses; Champ Fair was entitled to judgment on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices of HK$1,403,474.30 but the plaintiffs were entitled to set-off for defective goods and associated costs of US$79,912.31 (1991) and US$129,192.97 (1992), resulting in a final balance in favour of the plaintiffs; 1991 claims could be relied upon as set-off despite limitation; interest ordered at prime rate plus 1% on the final balance from the date of the writ to judgment; costs awarded to the plaintiffs (nisi) to be taxed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered: defendant (Champ Fair) entitled to HK$1,403,474.30 on counterclaim but plaintiffs entitled to set-off for defective goods (US$79,912.31 for 1991 and US$129,192.97 for 1992) resulting in a net judgment in plaintiffs' favour; costs to plaintiffs; interest at prime+1% on final balance from date of...
Orders
- Judgment for Champ Fair on its counterclaim for unpaid invoices in the sum of HK$1,403,474.30
- Set-off allowed to plaintiffs: US$79,912.31 (1991 defective goods and associated costs) against the counterclaim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment