LEUNG CHA SEE PHARMACEUTICAL LTD AND OTHERS v. MAN KAM HO AND OTHERS
Plaintiffs failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities and with the necessary particularity for fraud allegations, that the April–July 2018 transactions were fictitious or constituted misappropriation; Man (as General Manager) did owe fiduciary duties but plaintiffs did not prove breach; Zhu was not liable to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2003
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Leung Cha See Pharmaceutical Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Propitious Fame Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: Ritzy Aspiration Limited; 1st Defendant: Man Kam Ho; 2nd Defendant: Zhu Danyun; 3rd Defendant: Bertone International Industrial Co Limited; 4th Defendant: M Dragon International Trading Development Limited; 5th Defendant: Fu Wah Medicine Company Limited; 6th Defendant: Five States Limited; 7th Defendant: Excelco Secretarial and Accountancy Service Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2025
- Case Number
- HCA1685/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial — Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duties, Alleged Fraud and Professional Negligence / Judgment Following 12‑day Trial (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendants; all claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Misappropriation, Sham/fictitious Transactions, Accessory Liability, Account of Profits, Audit/accounting Negligence, Onus and Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Cha See Pharmaceutical Limited
1st Plaintiff
Propitious Fame Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Ritzy Aspiration Limited
3rd Plaintiff
Man Kam Ho
1st Defendant
Zhu Danyun
2nd Defendant
Bertone International Industrial Co Limited
3rd Defendant
M Dragon International Trading Development Limited
4th Defendant
Fu Wah Medicine Company Limited
5th Defendant
Five States Limited
6th Defendant
Excelco Secretarial and Accountancy Service Limited
7th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial — Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duties, Alleged Fraud and Professional Negligence / Judgment Following 12‑day Trial (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Man was party to the Agreement
- 2 Whether Man as General Manager owed fiduciary duties to LCS
- 3 Whether the alleged transactions were fictitious/sham or genuine
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities and with the necessary particularity for fraud allegations, that the April–July 2018 transactions were fictitious or constituted misappropriation; Man (as General Manager) did owe fiduciary duties but plaintiffs did not prove breach; Zhu was not liable to pay the alleged HK$8,422,767.72 contribution because the Agreement did not impose that payment and ambiguities are resolved against the drafting investors; Propitious breached its funding obligations which entitled the other contracting party to withhold performance as appropriate; all pleaded claims against the defendants are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendants; all claims dismissed
Orders
- All claims by the Plaintiffs against Man, Zhu, the 4th Defendant, the 5th Defendant and Excelco dismissed
- Order nisi that the Plaintiffs pay the costs of the action to the Defendants with certificate for two counsel; liberty to apply within 14 days to vary costs order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment