HO KO SHING , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HO LEUNG HUNG, DECEASED v. HO CHEE AND ANOTHER
Court found the Deceased authorized the 1st defendant as an authorized person creating a bare trust over HK$509,227.94; the 1st defendant breached that trust by transferring HK$200,000 to the 2nd defendant and withdrawing HK$85,000 for purposes other than the Deceased's benefit; the 2nd defendant received the HK$200,000 with knowledge rendering retention unconscionable and acted with dishonest assistance; judgment awarded equitable compensation of HK$200,000 (against both jointly and severally) and HK$85,000 (against 1st defendant) with interest and costs; late witness application to call Ms Law was refused for inexcusable delay and prejudice.
- Citation
- HO KO SHING , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HO LEUNG HUNG, DECEASED v. HO CHEE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administrator): plaintiff (administrator of the estate of Ho Leung Hung); 1st Defendant: 1st defendant (youngest brother of the Deceased); 2nd Defendant: 2nd defendant (son of the 1st defendant)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2015
- Case Number
- DCCJ747/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trusts and Restitution (equitable Compensation for Breach of Trust) / Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff in equity
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Bare Trust, Knowing Receipt, Dishonest Assistance, Late Adducing of Witness Evidence, Letters of Administration, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
plaintiff (administrator of the estate of Ho Leung Hung)
Plaintiff (administrator)
1st defendant (youngest brother of the Deceased)
1st Defendant
2nd defendant (son of the 1st defendant)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trusts and Restitution (equitable Compensation for Breach of Trust) / Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant was a bare trustee of the Deceased's bank account balance
- 2 Whether the 1st defendant breached the trust by transferring HK$200,000 on 28 May 2008
- 3 Whether the 1st defendant breached the trust by withdrawing HK$85,000 on 26 Feb 2011
Ratio Decidendi
Court found the Deceased authorized the 1st defendant as an authorized person creating a bare trust over HK$509,227.94; the 1st defendant breached that trust by transferring HK$200,000 to the 2nd defendant and withdrawing HK$85,000 for purposes other than the Deceased's benefit; the 2nd defendant received the HK$200,000 with knowledge rendering retention unconscionable and acted with dishonest assistance; judgment awarded equitable compensation of HK$200,000 (against both jointly and severally) and HK$85,000 (against 1st defendant) with interest and costs; late witness application to call Ms Law was refused for inexcusable delay and prejudice.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff in equity
Orders
- Judgment against the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant jointly and severally for HK$200000 with interest at judgment rate from date of writ until payment
- Judgment against the 1st defendant for HK$85000 with interest at judgment rate from date of writ until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment