BRILLIANT CATERING MANAGEMENT LTD v. GLAD SUCCESS INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHER
Judgment was set aside because the plaintiff failed to produce satisfactory proof of service by registered post and the defendants raised sufficient triable issues — namely that the assignment and leaseback constituted an unlicensed loan thereby providing a good defence — such that the default judgment should not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- BRILLIANT CATERING MANAGEMENT LTD v. GLAD SUCCESS INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Brilliant Catering Management Limited; 1st Defendant: Glad Success Industries Limited; 2nd Defendant: Oliveira Claire
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2008
- Case Number
- DCCJ4098/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil – Possession and Recovery of Rental/mesne Profits Under Tenancy and Related Contractual/property Dispute / Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment (application to Set Aside Judgment Entered in Default)
- Outcome
- Default judgment entered on 29 October 2007 is set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Assignment and Leaseback, Unlicensed Moneylending, Possession, Mesne Profits, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brilliant Catering Management Limited
Plaintiff
Glad Success Industries Limited
1st Defendant
Oliveira Claire
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil – Possession and Recovery of Rental/mesne Profits Under Tenancy and Related Contractual/property Dispute / Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment (application to Set Aside Judgment Entered in Default)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment entered in absence of acknowledgment of service should be set aside
- 2 Whether service by registered post was properly proved in accordance with Order 10(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the defendants have a prima facie defence alleging the assignment and leaseback were a vehicle for unlicensed moneylending
Ratio Decidendi
Judgment was set aside because the plaintiff failed to produce satisfactory proof of service by registered post and the defendants raised sufficient triable issues — namely that the assignment and leaseback constituted an unlicensed loan thereby providing a good defence — such that the default judgment should not stand.
Court Disposition
Default judgment entered on 29 October 2007 is set aside.
Orders
- Judgment set aside
- Costs of the application to be borne by the defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment