THE QUEEN v. NG YING

THE QUEEN v. NG YING

The conviction was quashed because the prosecution's sole eyewitness evidence was unreliable and fraught with inconsistencies, the magistrate impermissibly shifted the burden onto the defendant, and the police officer standing at a distance was not competent to give the decisive measurements and inferences;...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
THE QUEEN v. NG YING
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant/appellant: NG Ying
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
8 March 1985
Case Number
HCMA155/1985
Procedural Posture
Criminal Road Traffic Ordinance (careless Driving) / Magistracy Criminal Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Careless Driving, Burden of Proof, Eyewitness Competence, Reliability of Police Evidence
Source Language
en
Road Traffic Law Criminal Law Evidence Law Careless Driving Burden of Proof Eyewitness Competence Reliability of Police Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

NG Ying

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Road Traffic Ordinance (careless Driving) / Magistracy Criminal Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved careless driving beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the defendant bore any obligation to disprove the Crown's case
  3. 3 Whether a police officer standing at a distance was competent to testify about vehicle speeds, braking and risk

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was quashed because the prosecution's sole eyewitness evidence was unreliable and fraught with inconsistencies, the magistrate impermissibly shifted the burden onto the defendant, and the police officer standing at a distance was not competent to give the decisive measurements and inferences; therefore the prosecution had not discharged the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Conviction quashed