WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN as the joint and several trustee of the property of KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK AND ANOTHER v. LEE LIN AND ANOTHER
The solicitor was found to have knowingly misled the Master about counsel’s earliest available trial dates; nevertheless a judge in chambers will not generally entertain an appeal to re‑fix timetabling set at a CMC and the correct procedural route to vary milestone dates is by application under O.25 r.3 to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 239
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN as the joint and several trustee of the property of KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK; 2nd Plaintiff: KWAN MEI SEE MACY as the joint and several trustee of the property of KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK; 1st Defendant: LEE LIN; 2nd Defendant: KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2026
- Case Number
- DCCJ6382/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action — Partition Claim by Trustees in Bankruptcy / Appeal in Chambers Against Master’s Case Management Conference Timetabling Decision (hearing and Reasons Given)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs between the parties
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Timetabling, Misleading the Court, Wasted Costs Order, Constructive Trust, Partition Sale
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN as the joint and several trustee of the property of KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK
1st Plaintiff
KWAN MEI SEE MACY as the joint and several trustee of the property of KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK
2nd Plaintiff
LEE LIN
1st Defendant
KWONG KWOK CHI PATRICK
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action — Partition Claim by Trustees in Bankruptcy / Appeal in Chambers Against Master’s Case Management Conference Timetabling Decision (hearing and Reasons Given)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor knowingly misled the Master about counsel’s earliest available trial dates
- 2 Whether a timetabling decision made by a Master at a case management conference is appealable to a judge in chambers or must be varied under Order 25 rule 3
- 3 Whether wasted costs orders should be made against the firm and the individual solicitor for misleading the court
Ratio Decidendi
The solicitor was found to have knowingly misled the Master about counsel’s earliest available trial dates; nevertheless a judge in chambers will not generally entertain an appeal to re‑fix timetabling set at a CMC and the correct procedural route to vary milestone dates is by application under O.25 r.3 to the Master/listing officer; accordingly the appeal was dismissed, but the court ordered no order as to costs between the parties and made wasted costs orders against RL&Co (no legal aid taxation and not payable by defendant) and against the individual solicitor to pay the legally aided taxed fees of counsel for the defendant, and referred the conduct to the Law Society.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs between the parties
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs between Plaintiffs and Defendant Lee Lin
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment