Leung Koon-chun v. City Act Trading Ltd. t/a Bright Light Engineering Co.
Applying statutory test and authorities, the judge found the deceased's death resulted from his underlying coronary atherosclerosis alone and that employment, including overtime and stress, did not materially contribute; therefore the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment and the employer is not liable under the Employees Compensation Ordinance.
- Citation
- Leung Koon-chun v. City Act Trading Ltd. t/a Bright Light Engineering Co.
- Parties
- Applicant (claimant/widow): Leung Koon-chun on behalf of the Dependants of Chow Kam-wing, deceased; Respondent (employer): City Act Trading Limited trading as Bright Light Engineering Company
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2002
- Case Number
- DCEC915/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; judgment for the respondents
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Arising Out of and in the Course of Employment, Contributory Disease, Quantum (interest)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Koon-chun on behalf of the Dependants of Chow Kam-wing, deceased
Applicant (claimant/widow)
City Act Trading Limited trading as Bright Light Engineering Company
Respondent (employer)
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased's fatal heart attack arose out of and in the course of his employment
- 2 Whether employment-related stress/overtime materially contributed to fatal coronary event versus death from pre-existing coronary atherosclerosis alone
- 3 Applicable causation standard under the Employees Compensation Ordinance (contribution vs sole cause)
Ratio Decidendi
Applying statutory test and authorities, the judge found the deceased's death resulted from his underlying coronary atherosclerosis alone and that employment, including overtime and stress, did not materially contribute; therefore the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment and the employer is not liable under the Employees Compensation Ordinance.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; judgment for the respondents
Orders
- Application dismissed and judgment entered for the respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment