CHAN CHEUNG HING v. CHAN TANG LAN AND OTHERS
The wife held the properties on trust for herself and the husband in equal shares; the court found the purported tenancies and certain assignments to be shams concocted to defeat the husband's interest, that D2–D4 knowingly participated, and therefore awarded equitable compensation (damages) against the wife and against assisting defendants jointly where appropriate, set aside the impugned tenancies, and appointed a receiver to protect and realize the assets.
- Citation
- CHAN CHEUNG HING v. CHAN TANG LAN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHAN CHEUNG HING; 1st Defendant: CHAN TANG LAN; 2nd Defendant: YUEN FUNG KIU; 3rd Defendant: CHAN YING LUN; 4th Defendant: YIM CHUI LING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 1989
- Case Number
- HCA4568/1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil; Trusts and Property Dispute Arising From Matrimonial Proceedings / Judgment (assessment of Remedies and Appointment of Receiver)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff. Impugned tenancies declared sham and set aside; damages awarded against defendants; receiver appointed over three premises; further orders for sale/realization and costs to be determined and formal orders to be drawn.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Sham Transaction, Knowing Assistance to Breach of Trust, Equitable Compensation (damages), Appointment of Receiver, Order for Sale/partition
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN CHEUNG HING
Plaintiff
CHAN TANG LAN
1st Defendant
YUEN FUNG KIU
2nd Defendant
CHAN YING LUN
3rd Defendant
YIM CHUI LING
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil; Trusts and Property Dispute Arising From Matrimonial Proceedings / Judgment (assessment of Remedies and Appointment of Receiver)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the wife breached her duties as trustee by creating sham tenancies and transfers to defeat the husband's beneficial interest
- 2 Whether the purported tenancies and assignments were shams and therefore void
- 3 Whether the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants knowingly assisted the breach of trust
Ratio Decidendi
The wife held the properties on trust for herself and the husband in equal shares; the court found the purported tenancies and certain assignments to be shams concocted to defeat the husband's interest, that D2–D4 knowingly participated, and therefore awarded equitable compensation (damages) against the wife and against assisting defendants jointly where appropriate, set aside the impugned tenancies, and appointed a receiver to protect and realize the assets.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff. Impugned tenancies declared sham and set aside; damages awarded against defendants; receiver appointed over three premises; further orders for sale/realization and costs to be determined and formal orders to be drawn.
Orders
- Impugned tenancies in respect of the four premises declared shams and set aside
- Judgment for damages against 1st Defendant (wife) in the sum of 488500 HKD
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment