CHAN HO ENGINEERING PTE LTD v. WONG WING KWONG AND ANOTHER
Court found there was a binding agreement between Chan and Wong reached orally and recorded in a poorly drafted written note; the misnaming of parties was cured by evidence and partial performance (transfer of shares on 31 August 2000); accordingly the written agreement was rectified to reflect the parties' intention and 1st Defendant ordered to pay HK$480,000; defendants' counterclaims failed for lack of credible evidence and the guarantee did not bind the Plaintiff.
- Citation
- CHAN HO ENGINEERING PTE LTD v. WONG WING KWONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHAN HO ENGINEERING PTE LTD; 1st Defendant: WONG WING KWONG; 2nd Defendant: WING LI PRECISION METAL WORK COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2004
- Case Number
- DCCJ13115/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action District Court / Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiff against 1st Defendant; judgment against 2nd Defendant in part; defendants' counterclaims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Agreement, Share Transfer, Guarantee, Counterclaim, Partial Performance, Sale of Goods
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN HO ENGINEERING PTE LTD
Plaintiff
WONG WING KWONG
1st Defendant
WING LI PRECISION METAL WORK COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action District Court / Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the written agreement should be rectified to reflect the parties' true agreement
- 2 Whether the 1st Defendant was personally liable to pay $480,000 to the Plaintiff
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff remained liable for the 2nd Defendant's debts after 1 September 2000
Ratio Decidendi
Court found there was a binding agreement between Chan and Wong reached orally and recorded in a poorly drafted written note; the misnaming of parties was cured by evidence and partial performance (transfer of shares on 31 August 2000); accordingly the written agreement was rectified to reflect the parties' intention and 1st Defendant ordered to pay HK$480,000; defendants' counterclaims failed for lack of credible evidence and the guarantee did not bind the Plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiff against 1st Defendant; judgment against 2nd Defendant in part; defendants' counterclaims dismissed.
Orders
- Agreement rectified to reflect the parties' intention recorded in August 2000
- Judgment against 1st Defendant for HK$480,000 with interest at judgment rate from date of writ to date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment