HKSAR v. CHAN KWOK LEUNG

HKSAR v. CHAN KWOK LEUNG

The application for extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 was refused because the notice was filed well outside the 28‑day limit and no substantive or arguable grounds for appeal were raised; consequently leave to appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HKSAR v. CHAN KWOK LEUNG
Parties
Applicant: CHAN KWOK LEUNG; Respondent: HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
Court
Court of Final Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
25 May 1998
Case Number
FAMC4/1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Extension of Time Sought Under S33(2) of Cap 484
Outcome
Extension of time refused and application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Identification Evidence, Robbery, Statutory Time Limits
Source Language
et
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Evidence Sentencing Leave to Appeal Extension of Time Identification Evidence Robbery +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CHAN KWOK LEUNG

Applicant

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Extension of Time Sought Under S33(2) of Cap 484

  1. 1 Whether to grant an extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 to permit a late application for leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether there were any arguable grounds of appeal of substance (including challenges to identification evidence)

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 was refused because the notice was filed well outside the 28‑day limit and no substantive or arguable grounds for appeal were raised; consequently leave to appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Extension of time refused and application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 refused
  • Application for leave to appeal dismissed