HKSAR v. CHAN KWOK LEUNG
The application for extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 was refused because the notice was filed well outside the 28‑day limit and no substantive or arguable grounds for appeal were raised; consequently leave to appeal was dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAN KWOK LEUNG
- Parties
- Applicant: CHAN KWOK LEUNG; Respondent: HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1998
- Case Number
- FAMC4/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Extension of Time Sought Under S33(2) of Cap 484
- Outcome
- Extension of time refused and application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Identification Evidence, Robbery, Statutory Time Limits
- Source Language
- et
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN KWOK LEUNG
Applicant
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Extension of Time Sought Under S33(2) of Cap 484
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant an extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 to permit a late application for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether there were any arguable grounds of appeal of substance (including challenges to identification evidence)
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 was refused because the notice was filed well outside the 28‑day limit and no substantive or arguable grounds for appeal were raised; consequently leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Extension of time refused and application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Extension of time under s33(2) Cap 484 refused
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj (Not for circulation) FAMC No. 4 of 1998 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 4 OF 1998 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC 218 OF 1997) ____________________ Between : CHAN KWOK LEUNG Applicant - and - HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION Respondent ____________________ Appeal Committee : Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ and Mr Justice Bokhary PJ in Court Date of Hearing : 25 May 1998 Date of Determination : 25 May 1998 ________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ____________ Mr Justice Litton PJ: This is the determination of the Appeal Committee on an application for leave to appeal brought under s32(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap 484. The applicant was convicted on 16 April 1997 after trial in the High Court on one count of robbery and was sentenced to six years imprisonment. His application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was heard on 13 November 1997 and was dismissed on the same day. On 10 March 1998 he filed a notice of application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against that judgment. This is well outside the time limit of 28 days imposed by s33(1) of Cap 484. To entertain this application, an extension of time under s33(2) is needed. The conviction arose from a robbery in commercial premises at Kwun Tong on the morning of 25 January 1992. A group of men entered those premises, one armed with what looked like a handgun and another with a knife, forced the occupants into a sample storage room, bound them up with adhesive tape and robbed them of money and other property. The applicant was arrested on 7 March 1992 when he went to the Kwun Tong Pier for a rendezvous and the police found him wearing a watch which had been stolen in the course of the robbery. There were four occupants in the premises at the time of the robbery. One of them, a Miss Yu, identified the applicant as one of the robbers at an identification parade held on 12 March 1992. Miss Yu testified to the effect that on the morning of the robbery she was answering the telephone when she noticed that something was amiss: A man was holding one of her colleagues from behind; the man looked pretty fierce , took the telephone from her hands and said robbery . She was then ordered out of the room into the sample storage room where she was bound up with adhesive tapes, along with several others. The trial judge gave a faultless summing-up covering all aspects of the case and, in particular, the need for caution regarding the identification evidence. No ground of any substance was raised in the applicant s application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal and none has been raised before us. We refuse to extend the time for lodging the application. This application is dismissed. (Henry Litton) Permanent Judge (Charles Ching) Permanent Judge (K. Bokhary) Permanent Judge Applicant, Chan Kwok-leung, in person, present. Mr Albert Wong, SGC of Department of Justice for Respondent/Director of Public Prosecutions - PAGE - @\\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Ne01: winspool HP LaserJet 4 Plus \\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Letter \\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Letter FAMC No JUDICIARY Normal sslai Microsoft Word 8.0 JUDICIARY FAMC No Title _PID_GUID Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8