CHAN SAN v. HANS LI, the person appointed to represent the estate of KAM SHUI MAN, the Deceased AND OTHERS
The application to amend was allowed because the court concluded the amendments were factual adjustments that did not alter the claim's subject matter, there was no evidence of mala fides or undue delay causing irremediable prejudice, and any prejudice could be compensated by costs; therefore justice required...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CHAN SAN v. HANS LI, the person appointed to represent the estate of KAM SHUI MAN, the Deceased AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHAN SAN; 1st Defendant: HANS LI, the person appointed to represent the estate of KAM SHUI MAN, the Deceased; 2nd Defendant (discontinued): The Personal Representatives of CHEUNG TUNGFAT, the Deceased; 3rd Defendant (discontinued): CHEUNG SIU-PING, JODIE; 4th Defendant (discontinued): CHEUNG WAI CHUN, the Personal Representative of CHEUNG TUNGTAK, alias CHEUNG TAK, the Deceased; 5th Defendant (discontinued): CHEUNG KAISANG alias CHEUNG KISHANG (or SANG); 6th Defendant (discontinued): CHEUNG WAI CHUNG, the Personal Representative of CHEUNG TUNGTAK alias CHEUNG TAK, the Deceased
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2017
- Case Number
- HCA840/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land/title Dispute / Application to Amend Pleadings (chambers Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Statement of Truth, Prejudice and Delay, Civil Justice Reform
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN SAN
Plaintiff
HANS LI, the person appointed to represent the estate of KAM SHUI MAN, the Deceased
1st Defendant
The Personal Representatives of CHEUNG TUNGFAT, the Deceased
2nd Defendant (discontinued)
CHEUNG SIU-PING, JODIE
3rd Defendant (discontinued)
CHEUNG WAI CHUN, the Personal Representative of CHEUNG TUNGTAK, alias CHEUNG TAK, the Deceased
4th Defendant (discontinued)
CHEUNG KAISANG alias CHEUNG KISHANG (or SANG)
5th Defendant (discontinued)
CHEUNG WAI CHUNG, the Personal Representative of CHEUNG TUNGTAK alias CHEUNG TAK, the Deceased
6th Defendant (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Civil Land/title Dispute / Application to Amend Pleadings (chambers Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the Re-re-Amended Statement of Claim
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments change the substance of the case so as to cause irremediable prejudice to the defendant
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is acting bona fide or mala fide in seeking the amendment
Ratio Decidendi
The application to amend was allowed because the court concluded the amendments were factual adjustments that did not alter the claim's subject matter, there was no evidence of mala fides or undue delay causing irremediable prejudice, and any prejudice could be compensated by costs; therefore justice required permitting the amendments with consequential procedural directions.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Application allowed; service of the amended pleadings be dispensed with
- 1st Defendant is at liberty to file and serve amended pleadings consequential upon the plaintiff's amendments within 28 days from the date hereof
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment