CHAN SHU PING v. HANG ON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
Court found the accident arose in the course of employment and established liability against Hang On; on the section 18 appeal the court accepted Dr Fu's expert evidence and allowed a 6% loss of earning capacity in absence of opposition; under s11(1) the pre-accident monthly income adopted was HK$17,600 (the month immediately preceding the accident); sick leave for section 10 calculation was divided by 30 days and, applying the agreed figures and court discretion under s10(5), the awards were assessed (s9 HK$76,032; s10 HK$359,509.33; s10A HK$5,510) with credit for HK$200,000 already received yielding a net judgment of HK$241,051.33 with specified interest and costs awarded to the applicant.
- Citation
- CHAN SHU PING v. HANG ON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant: CHAN SHU PING; 1st Respondent: HANG ON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: BOSEE (ASIA) LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2010
- Case Number
- DCEC1519/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation (cap.282) / Section 18 Appeal and Final Judgment on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Judgment for Applicant against Hang On Construction Engineering Limited and Bosee (Asia) Limited in the net sum of HK$241,051.33 with interest; costs awarded to Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Employees Compensation Ordinance, Loss of Earning Capacity, Section 18 Appeal, Assessment of Income, Sick Leave Compensation, Interest and Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN SHU PING
Applicant
HANG ON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LIMITED
1st Respondent
BOSEE (ASIA) LIMITED
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation (cap.282) / Section 18 Appeal and Final Judgment on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether accident arose out of course of employment and employer liability
- 2 Whether the MAB assessment of 5% loss of earning capacity should be displaced on section 18 appeal
- 3 Which pre-accident income figure should be adopted under section 11(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Court found the accident arose in the course of employment and established liability against Hang On; on the section 18 appeal the court accepted Dr Fu's expert evidence and allowed a 6% loss of earning capacity in absence of opposition; under s11(1) the pre-accident monthly income adopted was HK$17,600 (the month immediately preceding the accident); sick leave for section 10 calculation was divided by 30 days and, applying the agreed figures and court discretion under s10(5), the awards were assessed (s9 HK$76,032; s10 HK$359,509.33; s10A HK$5,510) with credit for HK$200,000 already received yielding a net judgment of HK$241,051.33 with specified interest and costs awarded to the applicant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Applicant against Hang On Construction Engineering Limited and Bosee (Asia) Limited in the net sum of HK$241,051.33 with interest; costs awarded to Applicant.
Orders
- Judgment entered against Hang On Construction Engineering Limited and Bosee (Asia) Limited in the sum of HK$241,051.33 with interest at half judgment rate from date of accident to judgment and at judgment rate thereafter
- Hang On Construction Engineering Limited and Bosee (Asia) Limited shall pay the Applicant's costs of this application; costs to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment