WOO WING CHI AND ANOTHER v. CHAN SHUN CHING JOSEPHINE
The expungement application was dismissed because the contested WhatsApp communications were intended to be open and thus not protected by without prejudice privilege, and separately were waived by failure to object earlier; leave to file a late fourth affidavit and uplift the legal aid stay were refused as unjustified and late; the defendant failed to prove lack of actual notice so the default judgment was regular on service grounds but, on consideration of the merits, there was a real prospect regarding the 2nd declaration that it was a loan evidenced by contemporaneous messages and payments; accordingly the Default Judgment was set aside on terms requiring payment into court of...
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 1610
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Woo Wing Chi; 2nd Plaintiff: Chan Ming Wai; Defendant: Chan Shun Ching Josephine
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2023
- Case Number
- DCCJ299/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Recovery of Sums, Setting Aside Default Judgment and Interlocutory Applications / Appeal From Master’s Order and Hearing of Expungement Summons in Chambers
- Outcome
- Expungement Summons dismissed; leave to file further affidavit and uplift legal aid stay refused; Default Judgment set aside on terms
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Service of Process, Without Prejudice Privilege, Leave to Adduce Further Evidence (ladd V Marshall), Declarations of Trust Vs Loan Characterization, Reflective Loss, Costs Orders, Legal Aid Stay
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Woo Wing Chi
1st Plaintiff
Chan Ming Wai
2nd Plaintiff
Chan Shun Ching Josephine
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Recovery of Sums, Setting Aside Default Judgment and Interlocutory Applications / Appeal From Master’s Order and Hearing of Expungement Summons in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parts of plaintiffs’ affirmation and WhatsApp communications are protected by without prejudice privilege and should be expunged
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to file a late fourth affidavit and admit further evidence on appeal
- 3 Whether legal aid stay should be uplifted
Ratio Decidendi
The expungement application was dismissed because the contested WhatsApp communications were intended to be open and thus not protected by without prejudice privilege, and separately were waived by failure to object earlier; leave to file a late fourth affidavit and uplift the legal aid stay were refused as unjustified and late; the defendant failed to prove lack of actual notice so the default judgment was regular on service grounds but, on consideration of the merits, there was a real prospect regarding the 2nd declaration that it was a loan evidenced by contemporaneous messages and payments; accordingly the Default Judgment was set aside on terms requiring payment into court of...
Court Disposition
Expungement Summons dismissed; leave to file further affidavit and uplift legal aid stay refused; Default Judgment set aside on terms
Orders
- Expungement Summons dismissed in entirety
- Costs of and incidental to the Expungement Summons to the plaintiffs forthwith with a certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment