香港特別行政區 訴 陳善慈
Bail pending appeal was refused because the applicant had served only about 5 months of an aggregate 17-month sentence and, even on the most favourable view, that period was insufficient to reflect the seriousness of the offences; therefore there was no sufficient basis to grant bail pending appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCA 558
- Parties
- Respondent: 香港特別行政區 (The Government of the HKSAR); Applicant: CHAN SIN CHI SUZUKI (陳善慈)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 2020
- Case Number
- CACC61/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- bail application refused
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Sentencing, Attempted Obtaining Property by Deception, Failure to Surrender to Custody
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
香港特別行政區 (The Government of the HKSAR)
Respondent
CHAN SIN CHI SUZUKI (陳善慈)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail should be granted pending an appeal against sentence
- 2 Whether time already served is sufficient to reflect the seriousness of the offences
- 3 Whether there is a sufficient basis in the interests of justice to release the applicant pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Bail pending appeal was refused because the applicant had served only about 5 months of an aggregate 17-month sentence and, even on the most favourable view, that period was insufficient to reflect the seriousness of the offences; therefore there was no sufficient basis to grant bail pending appeal.
Court Disposition
bail application refused
Orders
- Bail pending appeal refused.
- The applicant's application for leave to appeal against sentence is to be listed for hearing by a divisional court as soon as possible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 61/2020 [2020] HKCA 558 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 上訴期間申請保釋 刑事上訴案件2020年第61號 (原區域法院刑事案件2017年第995號) 答辯人 香港特別行政區 對 申請人 陳善慈 (CHAN SIN CHI SUZUKI) 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長楊振權 聆訊日期: 2020年7月8日 判案書日期: 2020年7月8日 判案書 申請人(陳善慈)在區域法院暫委法官鄭紀航(原審法官)席前承認一項企圖以欺騙手段取得財產罪和一項無合理因由而沒有按照法庭的指定歸押罪。 2020年5月7日,原審法官就上述兩項控罪判處申請人分別入獄15個月和3個月監禁,而3個月的判刑中的2個月要和15個月的判刑分期執行。申請人要服的總刑期為17個月。 申請人不服判刑,並已提出上訴許可申請,要求獲准就判刑上訴。申請人現要求本席批准她保釋外出等候上訴。 申請人至今只服刑約5個月,即使以對申請人最有利的角度考慮案件,申請人已服的刑期不可能足夠反映申請人所犯罪行的嚴重性。 本席不認為有足夠基礎批准申請人保釋等候上訴。本席駁回申請人的保釋申請,但下令申請人就判刑提出的上訴許可申請要盡快排期由合議庭處理。 (楊振權) 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長 答辯人: 由律政司高級檢控官招秉茵代表。 申請人: 沒有律師代表,親自應訊。