CHAN WAI LUNG v. LEE SHU YEN AND ANOTHER
Because the defendants wilfully failed to comply with prior orders including an unless order and were debarred from defending, the court struck out their defence and entered judgment in default: awarding damages of US$1,759,288, declaring the sums transferred into D2's account to be held by D2 on constructive trust for the plaintiff, granting a disclosure order against specified third parties to trace released account balances, awarding interest and indemnity costs, and permitting enforcement steps to protect the plaintiff's proprietary and personal remedies.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2406
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chan Wai Lung; 1st Defendant: Lee Shu Yen; 2nd Defendant: Novo Digital Company Limited; Third Party (spouse of 1st Defendant): Li Ki Ki; Third Party (bank): HSBC (Hong Kong); Third Party (bank): Standard Chartered Bank; Third Party (bank): DBS Bank (Hong Kong)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2025
- Case Number
- HCA736/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, Proprietary Claims and Disclosure / Hearing on Default Judgment and Third Party Disclosure
- Outcome
- Judgment entered in default against 1st and 2nd Defendants; Defence struck out; declaratory and disclosure relief granted; indemnity costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Constructive Trust, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Declaratory Relief, Disclosure Orders to Locate Assets, Indemnity Costs, Contempt for Non Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chan Wai Lung
Plaintiff
Lee Shu Yen
1st Defendant
Novo Digital Company Limited
2nd Defendant
Li Ki Ki
Third Party (spouse of 1st Defendant)
HSBC (Hong Kong)
Third Party (bank)
Standard Chartered Bank
Third Party (bank)
DBS Bank (Hong Kong)
Third Party (bank)
Procedural Posture
Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, Proprietary Claims and Disclosure / Hearing on Default Judgment and Third Party Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' failure to comply with court orders and an unless order justified striking out the defence and entry of judgment in default
- 2 Whether plaintiff established deceit and/or unlawful means conspiracy entitling him to damages
- 3 Whether funds received by D2 are held on constructive trust for the plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendants wilfully failed to comply with prior orders including an unless order and were debarred from defending, the court struck out their defence and entered judgment in default: awarding damages of US$1,759,288, declaring the sums transferred into D2's account to be held by D2 on constructive trust for the plaintiff, granting a disclosure order against specified third parties to trace released account balances, awarding interest and indemnity costs, and permitting enforcement steps to protect the plaintiff's proprietary and personal remedies.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered in default against 1st and 2nd Defendants; Defence struck out; declaratory and disclosure relief granted; indemnity costs awarded.
Orders
- Defence dated 7 December 2022 struck out and defendants debarred from defending for failure to comply with court orders
- Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of US$1,759,288
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment