CHAN MAN LIN AND ANOTHER v. CHAN MAN YIN AND ANOTHER

CHAN MAN LIN AND ANOTHER v. CHAN MAN YIN AND ANOTHER

The appeal was dismissed because Master Lung was justified in setting aside the default judgment: the two actions arose from the same cause of action, the defendants had been granted unconditional leave to defend in the concurrent action (indicating an arguable defence), and maintaining both proceedings would be an abuse of process; there was no basis for the Court to interfere with the Master's decision.

Citation
CHAN MAN LIN AND ANOTHER v. CHAN MAN YIN AND ANOTHER
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Chan Man Lin; 2nd Plaintiff: Chan Man Lai; 1st Defendant: Chan Man Yin; 2nd Defendant: Chan Yiu Wong
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 November 2000
Case Number
HCA514/2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Interlocutory/chambers Decision (charging Order/default Judgment) / Appeal Against Master's Setting Aside of Default Judgment; Parties Subsequently Discontinued Action and Incorporated Claims Into HCA 18773 of 1999
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; no interference with Master's order setting aside default judgment; parties agreed to discontinue action and incorporate claims into HCA 18773/1999.
Legal Topics
Charging Order, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Summary Judgment, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, Equitable Mortgage
Source Language
EN
Civil Procedure Equity Property Debt Recovery Charging Order Default Judgment Setting Aside Judgment Summary Judgment +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chan Man Lin

1st Plaintiff

Chan Man Lai

2nd Plaintiff

Chan Man Yin

1st Defendant

Chan Yiu Wong

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal From Interlocutory/chambers Decision (charging Order/default Judgment) / Appeal Against Master's Setting Aside of Default Judgment; Parties Subsequently Discontinued Action and Incorporated Claims Into HCA 18773 of 1999

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Master correctly set aside the default judgment obtained in HCA 514/2000
  2. 2 Whether a charging order could be made absolute in light of the setting aside of judgment
  3. 3 Whether pursuing two actions on the same cause of action constituted abuse of process/res judicata

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because Master Lung was justified in setting aside the default judgment: the two actions arose from the same cause of action, the defendants had been granted unconditional leave to defend in the concurrent action (indicating an arguable defence), and maintaining both proceedings would be an abuse of process; there was no basis for the Court to interfere with the Master's decision.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; no interference with Master's order setting aside default judgment; parties agreed to discontinue action and incorporate claims into HCA 18773/1999.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Action discontinued and claims to be incorporated in HCA 18773 of 1999