CHARM MASTER ENTERPRISES LTD v. GRAND T G GOLD HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER
Summary judgment and interim payment based on the promissory notes were refused because triable disputes existed between the Plaintiff and the 2nd Defendant on presentment and the existence of the Trust; however the two letters of acknowledgement constituted a separate Acknowledgement of Debt supported by the 2nd Defendant's forbearance to sue, making the 1st Defendant's defence to that separate agreement shadowy; accordingly conditional leave to defend was granted to the 1st Defendant subject to payment into court of HK$12,000,000 within 28 days as security for the 2nd Defendant's counterclaim against the 1st Defendant.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2820
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charm Master Enterprises Limited; 1st Defendant: Grand T G Gold Holdings Limited; 2nd Defendant: J Thomson Asset Investment Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2020
- Case Number
- HCA397/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Debt Action and Counterclaim / Application for Summary Judgment and Interim Payment; Decision on Summons Dated 17 October 2019 (hearing 27 July 2020)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment and interim payment denied in relation to the promissory notes; conditional leave to defend granted to the 1st Defendant on the 2nd Defendant's counterclaim subject to security paid into court.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Interim Payment, Acknowledgement of Debt, Forbearance to Sue as Consideration, Constructive Trust, Indemnity, Breach of Trust
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charm Master Enterprises Limited
Plaintiff
Grand T G Gold Holdings Limited
1st Defendant
J Thomson Asset Investment Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt Action and Counterclaim / Application for Summary Judgment and Interim Payment; Decision on Summons Dated 17 October 2019 (hearing 27 July 2020)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment should be entered against the 1st Defendant under Order 14 Rule 5
- 2 Whether interim payment or payment into court of HK$12,000,000 should be ordered under Order 29 Rule 11
- 3 Whether the two letters dated 31 March 2016 and 7 March 2017 constitute a separate enforceable Acknowledgement of Debt supported by consideration (forbearance)
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment and interim payment based on the promissory notes were refused because triable disputes existed between the Plaintiff and the 2nd Defendant on presentment and the existence of the Trust; however the two letters of acknowledgement constituted a separate Acknowledgement of Debt supported by the 2nd Defendant's forbearance to sue, making the 1st Defendant's defence to that separate agreement shadowy; accordingly conditional leave to defend was granted to the 1st Defendant subject to payment into court of HK$12,000,000 within 28 days as security for the 2nd Defendant's counterclaim against the 1st Defendant.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment and interim payment denied in relation to the promissory notes; conditional leave to defend granted to the 1st Defendant on the 2nd Defendant's counterclaim subject to security paid into court.
Orders
- Leave granted to the 1st Defendant to defend the 2nd Defendant's counterclaim on condition that HK$12,000,000 be paid into court within 28 days as security to answer the counterclaim against the 1st Defendant
- Costs nisi: costs of the application to be the 2nd Defendant's costs in the cause of its counterclaim against the 1st Defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment