YE YING JIE v. SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
Although some procedural irregularities in service and the ex parte nature of some applications were established, the court exercised its discretion not to set aside the interlocutory judgments because the 2nd defendant's procedural defects were cured by a subsequent opportunity to be heard, the defendant's conduct was contumacious, there was no meritorious defence on the evidence, and overall justice required refusal to set aside.
- Citation
- YE YING JIE v. SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chen Shun Zhong; Plaintiff: Ye Ying Jie; Plaintiff: Yang Qi Jie; Plaintiff: Yang Yong Long; Plaintiff: Su Shi Yu; Plaintiff: Huang Zhi Mei; 1st Defendant: SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: HENG LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 1999
- Case Number
- DCCJ17042/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (employment/contract Arising From Recruitment) / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgments Following Striking Out for Non‑compliance With Unless Orders
- Outcome
- Applications by the 2nd defendant to set aside interlocutory judgments dismissed; judgment maintained against 2nd defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Unless Order, Particulars of Pleadings, Service of Process, Counterclaim, Contumacious Conduct
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chen Shun Zhong
Plaintiff
Ye Ying Jie
Plaintiff
Yang Qi Jie
Plaintiff
Yang Yong Long
Plaintiff
Su Shi Yu
Plaintiff
Huang Zhi Mei
Plaintiff
SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
HENG LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (employment/contract Arising From Recruitment) / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgments Following Striking Out for Non‑compliance With Unless Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory judgments obtained in absence of 2nd defendant were irregular for defective service and being ex parte
- 2 Whether applications to strike out for non‑compliance with unless orders must be heard inter partes or can properly be made ex parte
- 3 Whether 2nd defendant is entitled as of right to have default judgments set aside without showing merits
Ratio Decidendi
Although some procedural irregularities in service and the ex parte nature of some applications were established, the court exercised its discretion not to set aside the interlocutory judgments because the 2nd defendant's procedural defects were cured by a subsequent opportunity to be heard, the defendant's conduct was contumacious, there was no meritorious defence on the evidence, and overall justice required refusal to set aside.
Court Disposition
Applications by the 2nd defendant to set aside interlocutory judgments dismissed; judgment maintained against 2nd defendant.
Orders
- Applications dismissed
- Order nisi for costs that the 2nd defendant do pay the costs of the plaintiffs of these applications with certificate for counsel to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment