CHEN SHUN ZHONG v. SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
The court exercised its discretion to refuse to set aside the interlocutory judgments because the procedural prejudice had been cured by affording the 2nd defendant a hearing, the 2nd defendant had behaved contumaciously in failing to comply with unless orders and had not demonstrated a meritorious defence; accordingly the applications to set aside were dismissed and the interlocutory judgments stood.
- Citation
- CHEN SHUN ZHONG v. SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHEN SHUN ZHONG; Plaintiff: YE YING JIE; Plaintiff: YANG QI JIE; Plaintiff: YANG YONG LONG; Plaintiff: SU SHI YU; Plaintiff: HUANG ZHI MEI; 1st Defendant: SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: HENG LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 1999
- Case Number
- DCCJ17041/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Employment/contract / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgments Following Striking Out of Defence and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Applications by the 2nd defendant to set aside the interlocutory judgments dismissed; judgments not set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Striking Out, Unless Orders, Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Counterclaim, Contumacy
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHEN SHUN ZHONG
Plaintiff
YE YING JIE
Plaintiff
YANG QI JIE
Plaintiff
YANG YONG LONG
Plaintiff
SU SHI YU
Plaintiff
HUANG ZHI MEI
Plaintiff
SUCCESS CIVIL & FOUNDATION COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
HENG LEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Employment/contract / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgments Following Striking Out of Defence and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory judgments obtained in absence of the 2nd defendant were irregular due to defective service and ex parte procedure
- 2 Whether striking out of defence and counterclaim for failure to comply with unless orders was irregular
- 3 Whether the court must or may exercise discretion to set aside default/interlocutory judgments and whether merits must be shown
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to refuse to set aside the interlocutory judgments because the procedural prejudice had been cured by affording the 2nd defendant a hearing, the 2nd defendant had behaved contumaciously in failing to comply with unless orders and had not demonstrated a meritorious defence; accordingly the applications to set aside were dismissed and the interlocutory judgments stood.
Court Disposition
Applications by the 2nd defendant to set aside the interlocutory judgments dismissed; judgments not set aside.
Orders
- Applications dismissed
- In each action order nisi that the 2nd defendant pay the plaintiffs costs of these applications with certificate for counsel to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment