CHEN ZHENMIN v. HARTANTO HADY AND ANOTHER
The disputed internal financial and management documents are irrelevant to the assessment of market value because they are confidential and were not available to the market or to prospective purchasers at the valuation date; applying Re Lynall, the Disclosure Order requiring production of those documents was set aside.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 2123
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHEN ZHENMIN; 1st Defendant: HARTANTO HADY; 2nd Defendant: GLOBAL IP ASIA LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2023
- Case Number
- HCA1829/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Discovery Application Appeal / Appeal to Judge in Chambers (de Novo Hearing)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Disclosure Order and master's costs order set aside; discovery of the disputed documents refused
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Damages for Breach, Disclosure of Corporate Documents, Market Valuation of Shares, Confidentiality of Internal Documents
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHEN ZHENMIN
Plaintiff
HARTANTO HADY
1st Defendant
GLOBAL IP ASIA LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Discovery Application Appeal / Appeal to Judge in Chambers (de Novo Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disputed internal financial and management documents of subsidiaries and of the company are relevant to assessment of market value of the subject shares for damages
- 2 Whether confidential internal company documents should be treated as available to a hypothetical purchaser for valuation purposes
- 3 Whether Re Lynall principle excluding confidential internal documents applies
Ratio Decidendi
The disputed internal financial and management documents are irrelevant to the assessment of market value because they are confidential and were not available to the market or to prospective purchasers at the valuation date; applying Re Lynall, the Disclosure Order requiring production of those documents was set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Disclosure Order and master's costs order set aside; discovery of the disputed documents refused
Orders
- Disclosure Order of 31 January 2023 set aside
- Master's costs order set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment