CHEUNG CHI PO v. KE JUN XIANG

CHEUNG CHI PO v. KE JUN XIANG

The master’s order was affirmed because, on a provisional assessment, the defendant demonstrated sufficient prospects of success on a genuine factual dispute (denial that any loan was advanced) such that the default judgment should be set aside and the matter resolved at interlocutory steps or trial; the short delay...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CHEUNG CHI PO v. KE JUN XIANG
Parties
Plaintiff: Cheung Chi Po; Defendant: Ke Jun Xiang
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 June 2011
Case Number
HCA1168/2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt/contract (recovery of Loan/promissory Note) / Appeal From Master's Decision; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and for Extension of Time
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; master's order affirmed; default judgment set aside; extension of time to bring the appeal granted.
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Default Judgment, Extension of Time to File Appeal, Promissory Note Enforcement, Credibility Assessment, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contract Debt Recovery Evidence Setting Aside Default Judgment Extension of Time to File Appeal Promissory Note Enforcement Credibility Assessment +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cheung Chi Po

Plaintiff

Ke Jun Xiang

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Debt/contract (recovery of Loan/promissory Note) / Appeal From Master's Decision; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment and for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the default judgment should be set aside
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has a real prospect of success on a defence that no loan was advanced
  3. 3 Whether an extension of time to file the notice of appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The master’s order was affirmed because, on a provisional assessment, the defendant demonstrated sufficient prospects of success on a genuine factual dispute (denial that any loan was advanced) such that the default judgment should be set aside and the matter resolved at interlocutory steps or trial; the short delay did not preclude granting an extension of time to bring the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; master's order affirmed; default judgment set aside; extension of time to bring the appeal granted.

Orders

  • Master's order affirmed
  • Default judgment set aside