香港特別行政區 訴 CHEUNG KA CHUN
The Court granted leave to appeal out of time, treated the grant as a substantive appeal, found the appellant's assistance to the authorities to be a valid mitigating factor, allowed the appeal and reduced the original sentence from 7 years 4 months to 5 years 6 months.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 CHEUNG KA CHUN
- Parties
- Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Applicant: Cheung Ka Chun (張家俊)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 2017
- Case Number
- CACC226/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time / Substantive Appeal Allowed
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; original sentence quashed and replaced with a reduced custodial term.
- Legal Topics
- Late Leave to Appeal, Mitigation for Assistance to Authorities, Sentence Reduction
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Respondent
Cheung Ka Chun (張家俊)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time / Substantive Appeal Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted
- 2 Whether the appellant's assistance to law enforcement justifies a reduced sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave to appeal out of time, treated the grant as a substantive appeal, found the appellant's assistance to the authorities to be a valid mitigating factor, allowed the appeal and reduced the original sentence from 7 years 4 months to 5 years 6 months.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; original sentence quashed and replaced with a reduced custodial term.
Orders
- Leave to appeal out of time granted
- The late application is treated as a substantive appeal and the appeal is allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 226/2016 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 不服刑罰逾期上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2016年第226號 (原高等法院刑事案件2013年第204號) __________________ 答辯人 香港特別行政區 與 申請人 CHEUNG KA CHUN (張家俊) __________________ 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭法官張澤祐 高等法院上訴法庭法官彭偉昌 聆訊日期:2017年4月28日 判案日期:2017年4月28日 判案理由書日期:2017年5月8日 判 案 理 由 書 上訴法庭法官彭偉昌頒發上訴庭判案理由書: 2014年3月11日,申請人在高等法院原訟法庭承認一項‘販運危險藥物’罪,涉及以淨含毒量計138.24克的‘冰’,被原審法官(陳慶偉法官)判囚7年4個月。 2016年7月20日,申請人以曾協助執法當局為由對他的判刑提出逾期上訴許可申請。 答辯方不反對申請人的申請。 本庭在閱卷及聽取過雙方陳詞後認同答辯方的立場。 本庭批准申請人的逾期上訴許可申請,並視之為正式的上訴及裁定該上訴得直。本庭下令,申請人的原有刑期撤銷,改判入獄5年6個月。 (張澤祐) (彭偉昌) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 高等法院上訴法庭法官 答辯人:由律政司高級檢控官招秉茵女士代表 申請人:由法律援助署委派何謝韋律師事務所轉聘黎建華大律師代表