HKSAR v. CHEUNG KIN CHUNG

HKSAR v. CHEUNG KIN CHUNG

The court was satisfied that the appellant had been duly served with the appeal bundle and notice of the hearing; accordingly the respondent's application was granted and the appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] HKCFI 1224
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: CHEUNG KIN CHUNG
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 May 2018
Case Number
HCMA112/2018
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (magistracy Appeal No 112 of 2018; on Appeal From KCMP 51/2018) / Judgment (4 May 2018)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Service of Documents, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Service of Documents Dismissal for Non Appearance Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

CHEUNG KIN CHUNG

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (magistracy Appeal No 112 of 2018; on Appeal From KCMP 51/2018) / Judgment (4 May 2018)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was duly served with the appeal bundle and notice of hearing
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's application to dismiss the appeal should be granted for non-appearance

Ratio Decidendi

The court was satisfied that the appellant had been duly served with the appeal bundle and notice of the hearing; accordingly the respondent's application was granted and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Respondent's application granted; appeal dismissed.