CHEUNG MAN KIT v. CHIU LOK YAN t/a NEW LUEN LIK ENGINEERING CO AND OTHERS
Court assessed LOEC by aggregating disciplines (orthopaedic 2%, psychiatric 12.5%, neurologic 20% = 34.5%) but found special circumstances under s9(1A) and applied the Paper Mills Formula because the Applicant could not resume pre‑injury work and the appropriate alternative job (lavatory cleaner) had a substantially lower wage (HK$10,636) producing a 61.33% earnings loss; Section 9 award: HK$1,619,112. Court exercised discretion under s10(5) to extend periodic payments to 36 months and, lacking comparable employees, applied CPI adjustments under s11(1A)(b) and s11(1B)(b) (+1.7% and +1.9%) to calculate Section 10 periodic payment award of HK$806,077.40; Section 10A medical expenses agreed...
- Citation
- [2024] HKDC 330
- Parties
- Applicant: Cheung Man Kit; 1st Respondent: Chiu Lok Yan trading as New Luen Lik Engineering Co; 2nd Respondent: Wing Lik Construction Engineering Limited; 3rd Respondent: Employees’ Compensation Assistance Fund Board
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2024
- Case Number
- DCEC515/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employees' Compensation Claim Under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (cap 282) / Trial for Assessment of Compensation (assessment Hearing)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Applicant. Compensation awarded to Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Earning Capacity, Section 9 Compensation, Section 10 Periodic Payments, Paper Mills Formula, CPI Adjustment Under Section 11, Section 10 a Medical Expenses, Extension of Periodic Payments Under Section 10(5)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheung Man Kit
Applicant
Chiu Lok Yan trading as New Luen Lik Engineering Co
1st Respondent
Wing Lik Construction Engineering Limited
2nd Respondent
Employees’ Compensation Assistance Fund Board
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees' Compensation Claim Under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (cap 282) / Trial for Assessment of Compensation (assessment Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate percentage for loss of earning capacity (LOEC) under s9
- 2 Whether to apply the Paper Mills Formula (s9(1A) special circumstances)
- 3 Whether to extend periodic payments beyond 24 months under s10(5)
Ratio Decidendi
Court assessed LOEC by aggregating disciplines (orthopaedic 2%, psychiatric 12.5%, neurologic 20% = 34.5%) but found special circumstances under s9(1A) and applied the Paper Mills Formula because the Applicant could not resume pre‑injury work and the appropriate alternative job (lavatory cleaner) had a substantially lower wage (HK$10,636) producing a 61.33% earnings loss; Section 9 award: HK$1,619,112. Court exercised discretion under s10(5) to extend periodic payments to 36 months and, lacking comparable employees, applied CPI adjustments under s11(1A)(b) and s11(1B)(b) (+1.7% and +1.9%) to calculate Section 10 periodic payment award of HK$806,077.40; Section 10A medical expenses agreed...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Applicant. Compensation awarded to Applicant.
Orders
- Section 9 compensation assessed at HK$1,619,112.00
- Section 10 periodic payments (extended to 36 months) assessed at HK$806,077.40
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment