CHEUNG WING TAN v. GOLDWOOD ENGINEERING LTD. AND OTHERS
On the balance of probabilities the 4 November 1998 workplace accident was a substantial contributing cause of the Applicant's present nocturnal seizures; there was no reliable evidence of pre‑1998 seizures attributable to the 1982 craniotomy and, in any event, under the Ordinance apportionment for pre‑existing conditions is not permitted unless the pre‑existing condition is the sole cause. The Applicant's pre‑accident daily wage was found to be HK$600 (monthly HK$12,828). Loss of earning capacity was assessed at 35% (30% for seizures analogous to loss of hearing in one ear plus 5% for headache). The Employees Compensation Board assessment of 28 April 2000 is set aside and judgment...
- Citation
- CHEUNG WING TAN v. GOLDWOOD ENGINEERING LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant: Cheung Wing Tan; 1st Respondent: Goldwood Engineering Limited; 2nd Respondent: Yuen Po Kuen and Yuen Chung Yuen Edward trading as Yick Hing Construction Company
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2001
- Case Number
- DCEC445/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation Claim Under the Employees Compensation Ordinance, Cap.282 / Assessment Hearing Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Applicant
- Legal Topics
- Employees Compensation, Causation (balance of Probabilities), Loss of Earning Capacity Assessment, Pre‑existing Condition and Apportionment, Weight of Medical Evidence, Proof of Earnings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheung Wing Tan
Applicant
Goldwood Engineering Limited
1st Respondent
Yuen Po Kuen and Yuen Chung Yuen Edward trading as Yick Hing Construction Company
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation Claim Under the Employees Compensation Ordinance, Cap.282 / Assessment Hearing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1998 workplace accident substantially contributed to the Applicant's current seizures
- 2 Whether pre‑existing condition (1982 craniotomy) was sole or contributing cause and whether apportionment is permitted under the Ordinance
- 3 Proper assessment of pre‑accident earnings
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the 4 November 1998 workplace accident was a substantial contributing cause of the Applicant's present nocturnal seizures; there was no reliable evidence of pre‑1998 seizures attributable to the 1982 craniotomy and, in any event, under the Ordinance apportionment for pre‑existing conditions is not permitted unless the pre‑existing condition is the sole cause. The Applicant's pre‑accident daily wage was found to be HK$600 (monthly HK$12,828). Loss of earning capacity was assessed at 35% (30% for seizures analogous to loss of hearing in one ear plus 5% for headache). The Employees Compensation Board assessment of 28 April 2000 is set aside and judgment...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Applicant
Orders
- Set aside Employees Compensation (Ordinary Assessment) Board assessment dated 28 April 2000
- Judgment for the Applicant in the sum of HK$361,181.41
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment