CHINA CITY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CO., (HK) LTD v. 宁波佳合港湾股权投资合伙企业(有限合伙)AND ANOTHER
The court found there was a serious issue to be tried as to the Shareholding Trust because a contemporaneous Entrusted Shareholding Agreement existed raising triable issues as to authenticity and effect; however there was no serious issue to be tried as to the ListCo Shares Trust because the Plaintiff failed to adduce credible evidence of payment/value or chain of funds to support a constructive or express trust in its favour. Accordingly the proprietary injunction preserving the Shareholding against the 1st Defendant was continued; injunctive and preservation relief against the 2nd Defendant and Mareva relief were refused; the ex parte Service Out Order was set aside as to the 2nd...
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1925
- Parties
- Plaintiff: China City Construction & Development Co., (HK) Limited; 1st Defendant: 宁波佳合港湾股权投资合伙企业(有限合伙); 2nd Defendant: Huinong Fund International Investments Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2303/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (trust and Proprietary Claims) / Interlocutory — Application for Interlocutory Injunctions and Preservation Orders; Application to Set Aside Service Out Order (order 11)
- Outcome
- Injunction against 1st Defendant in respect of Shareholding continued; remainder of injunction summons dismissed; Service Out Order set aside as to 2nd Defendant; no retrospective leave to serve out on 2nd Defendant; costs — no order (costs nisi)
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Proprietary Injunction, Mareva Injunction, Preservation Order (order 29), Service Out of Jurisdiction (order 11), Full and Frank Disclosure
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China City Construction & Development Co., (HK) Limited
Plaintiff
宁波佳合港湾股权投资合伙企业(有限合伙)
1st Defendant
Huinong Fund International Investments Ltd.
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (trust and Proprietary Claims) / Interlocutory — Application for Interlocutory Injunctions and Preservation Orders; Application to Set Aside Service Out Order (order 11)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a shareholding trust (Entrusted Shareholding Agreement) exists in favour of the Plaintiff
- 2 Whether the 2nd Defendant held the 69,000,000 H-shares and dividends on trust for the Plaintiff (ListCo Shares trust)
- 3 Whether interlocutory proprietary/Mareva injunctions and preservation orders should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The court found there was a serious issue to be tried as to the Shareholding Trust because a contemporaneous Entrusted Shareholding Agreement existed raising triable issues as to authenticity and effect; however there was no serious issue to be tried as to the ListCo Shares Trust because the Plaintiff failed to adduce credible evidence of payment/value or chain of funds to support a constructive or express trust in its favour. Accordingly the proprietary injunction preserving the Shareholding against the 1st Defendant was continued; injunctive and preservation relief against the 2nd Defendant and Mareva relief were refused; the ex parte Service Out Order was set aside as to the 2nd...
Court Disposition
Injunction against 1st Defendant in respect of Shareholding continued; remainder of injunction summons dismissed; Service Out Order set aside as to 2nd Defendant; no retrospective leave to serve out on 2nd Defendant; costs — no order (costs nisi)
Orders
- Continue injunction granted by ST Poon J against the 1st Defendant in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Injunction Order until judgment or further order
- Dismiss the remainder of the Injunction Summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment