CHINA CONSTRUCTION REALTY LTD v. LUCKY DRAGON LTD AND OTHERS
The summons to admit the supplemental witness statement and second affirmation was dismissed because Empire Star and Zhang failed to comply with the unless order without a satisfactory explanation, their disclosure was late and selective, and allowing the material at this late stage would unfairly prejudice the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CHINA CONSTRUCTION REALTY LTD v. LUCKY DRAGON LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: China Construction Realty Limited; 1st Defendant: Lucky Dragon Limited; 2nd Defendant: China International Club Limited; 3rd Defendant: China Entertainment Limited; 4th Defendant: Empire Star Holdings Limited; 1st Respondent (hcmp 159/2015): Zhang Xi
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2015
- Case Number
- HCA1237/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Under Conveyancing and Property Law With Related Contempt Proceedings / Interlocutory Pre Trial Application to Admit Supplemental Evidence and Application for Relief From Sanction; Contempt Proceedings Pending (hcmp 159/2015)
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; relief from sanction under Order 2 rule 5(1) refused
- Legal Topics
- Voidable Transactions, Section 60 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Supplemental Witness Evidence, Failure to Comply With Unless Order, Specific Discovery, Variation of Injunction to Purge Contempt
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China Construction Realty Limited
Plaintiff
Lucky Dragon Limited
1st Defendant
China International Club Limited
2nd Defendant
China Entertainment Limited
3rd Defendant
Empire Star Holdings Limited
4th Defendant
Zhang Xi
1st Respondent (hcmp 159/2015)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Under Conveyancing and Property Law With Related Contempt Proceedings / Interlocutory Pre Trial Application to Admit Supplemental Evidence and Application for Relief From Sanction; Contempt Proceedings Pending (hcmp 159/2015)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file and serve a supplemental witness statement and second affirmation at a late stage
- 2 Whether relief from the sanction of an unless order should be granted under Order 2 rule 5(1) of the Rules of the High Court
- 3 Whether belated and selective discovery of accounting documents would unfairly prejudice the plaintiff and obstruct trial preparation
Ratio Decidendi
The summons to admit the supplemental witness statement and second affirmation was dismissed because Empire Star and Zhang failed to comply with the unless order without a satisfactory explanation, their disclosure was late and selective, and allowing the material at this late stage would unfairly prejudice the plaintiff's ability to prepare for the imminent trial; accordingly relief from sanction under Order 2 rule 5(1) was refused and the application dismissed with costs nisi.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; relief from sanction under Order 2 rule 5(1) refused
Orders
- Summons dated 30 June 2015 dismissed
- Relief from the sanction of the unless order refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment