CHONG CHI CHING v. SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE (for and on behalf of the Government of the HKSAR) AND ANOTHER
On the balance of probabilities the court accepted the plaintiff's evidence that the toilet floor was wet and she slipped while carrying a ladle of water; the 2nd defendant failed to prove it had engaged a competent cleaning contractor or maintained an effective inspection system and thus breached its duty as occupier; the plaintiff was contributorily negligent to the extent of 20% for not taking more care after noticing the wet floor; damages were assessed on that basis and reduced by the agreed set-off from the employees' compensation settlement, resulting in a net award of HK$179,993 in favour of the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant.
- Citation
- CHONG CHI CHING v. SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE (for and on behalf of the Government of the HKSAR) AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chong Chi Ching; 1st Defendant (discontinued): Secretary for Justice; 2nd Defendant: Sources Fame Management Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2016
- Case Number
- DCPI2733/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff against Sources Fame Management Limited in the net sum of HK$179,993 (1st defendant discontinued)
- Legal Topics
- Slip and Fall, Contributory Negligence, Quantum of Damages, Entrustment to Independent Contractor Defence, Set Off of Employees' Compensation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chong Chi Ching
Plaintiff
Secretary for Justice
1st Defendant (discontinued)
Sources Fame Management Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the slip and fall occur as pleaded?
- 2 Was the occupier (2nd defendant) in breach of duty under occupiers' liability?
- 3 Was the cleaning contractor competent and was the inspection system adequate?
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court accepted the plaintiff's evidence that the toilet floor was wet and she slipped while carrying a ladle of water; the 2nd defendant failed to prove it had engaged a competent cleaning contractor or maintained an effective inspection system and thus breached its duty as occupier; the plaintiff was contributorily negligent to the extent of 20% for not taking more care after noticing the wet floor; damages were assessed on that basis and reduced by the agreed set-off from the employees' compensation settlement, resulting in a net award of HK$179,993 in favour of the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the plaintiff against Sources Fame Management Limited in the net sum of HK$179,993 (1st defendant discontinued)
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiff against Sources Fame Management Limited for HK$179,993 (after 20% contributory negligence and deduction of EC set-off)
- Interest: 2% per annum on PSLA from date of service of the writ to date of judgment; half judgment rate on special damages from date of accident to date of judgment; post-judgment interest on whole sum at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment