CHOW KAM HUNG v. HOI KONG IRONWARES GODOWN CO LTD
The court found the ironmongery/stainless steel partnership was dissolved by agreement on 15 October 2004; no binding oral settlement of accounts was proved; plaintiff's claims for accounts and for profit sharing under the oral promise are governed by the Limitation Ordinance and, on the facts, are time-barred; although 'net profits' would include rental income and the oral promise was supported by consideration, limitation extinguished the actionable claims.
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 1368
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chow Kam Hung; Person Appointed to Represent the Estate of Ng Wai Kwong (1st Defendant): Wong Kiu; Deceased 1st Defendant: Ng Wai Kwong (deceased); 2nd Defendant: Shine Wheel Limited; Defendant / Counterclaimant in Dccj5138/2019: Hoi Kong Ironwares Godown Company Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2022
- Case Number
- DCCJ5138/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Litigation: Partnership, Contract and Property Disputes / Judgment (district Court)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's actions in DCCJ5138/2019 and DCCJ5127/2019 dismissed; Hoi Kong's counterclaim dismissed; costs awarded to defendants as ordered below
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Partnership, Accounting and Inquiry, Limitation of Actions, Oral Promises and Consideration, Construction of Agreements, Interest on Capital
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chow Kam Hung
Plaintiff
Wong Kiu
Person Appointed to Represent the Estate of Ng Wai Kwong (1st Defendant)
Ng Wai Kwong (deceased)
Deceased 1st Defendant
Shine Wheel Limited
2nd Defendant
Hoi Kong Ironwares Godown Company Limited
Defendant / Counterclaimant in Dccj5138/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation: Partnership, Contract and Property Disputes / Judgment (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ironmongery and stainless steel partnership was dissolved on 15 October 2004
- 2 Whether capital of HK$300,000 bore interest at prime+2%
- 3 Whether an alleged oral settlement agreement was made and settled accounts
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the ironmongery/stainless steel partnership was dissolved by agreement on 15 October 2004; no binding oral settlement of accounts was proved; plaintiff's claims for accounts and for profit sharing under the oral promise are governed by the Limitation Ordinance and, on the facts, are time-barred; although 'net profits' would include rental income and the oral promise was supported by consideration, limitation extinguished the actionable claims.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's actions in DCCJ5138/2019 and DCCJ5127/2019 dismissed; Hoi Kong's counterclaim dismissed; costs awarded to defendants as ordered below
Orders
- DCCJ5138/2019: Plaintiff's action dismissed; Hoi Kong's counterclaim dismissed
- DCCJ5127/2019: Plaintiff's action dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment