CHOY BING WING v. BUILDING AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION, CHINA AND OTHERS
Leave to appeal refused because the questions advanced had no reasonable prospect of success: the registrar's refusal to release transcripts was proper, there was no demonstrated real possibility of bias by the master or judge, and the applicant failed to show cause to prevent the charging order from being made absolute; the Court properly exercised Order 59 rule 2A powers to decide on the papers and to refuse reconsideration by oral hearing.
- Citation
- CHOY BING WING v. BUILDING AUTHORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION, CHINA AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Choy Bing Wing; 1st Defendant: Building Authority of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; 2nd Defendant: Director of Civil Engineering Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; 3rd Defendant: Commissioner of Independent Commission Against Corruption of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2012
- Case Number
- HCMP2467/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Ruling and Enforcement Proceedings / Court of Appeal Determination on Leave to Appeal (application Heard on Papers)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Recusal, Charging Order Absolute, Leave to Appeal, Taxation of Costs, Access to Court Transcripts
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Choy Bing Wing
Plaintiff
Building Authority of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
1st Defendant
Director of Civil Engineering Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
2nd Defendant
Commissioner of Independent Commission Against Corruption of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Ruling and Enforcement Proceedings / Court of Appeal Determination on Leave to Appeal (application Heard on Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judge may lawfully refuse release of transcripts and tape records to a party
- 2 Whether a judge who previously dealt with aspects of a case must recuse on subsequent related matters absent a real possibility of bias
- 3 Whether a charging order can be made absolute while the underlying order giving rise to the debt is interlocutory or under appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal refused because the questions advanced had no reasonable prospect of success: the registrar's refusal to release transcripts was proper, there was no demonstrated real possibility of bias by the master or judge, and the applicant failed to show cause to prevent the charging order from being made absolute; the Court properly exercised Order 59 rule 2A powers to decide on the papers and to refuse reconsideration by oral hearing.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Order under Order 59 rule 2A(8) that the applicant may not request reconsideration at an oral hearing pursuant to rule 2A(7)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment