龐征云及另一人 對 CHOW CHUN KIT(周俊傑)the personal representative of the estate of CHOW WING CHEUK(周榮灼)
The court found contempt established but not deliberate contumacy; the proper starting point was a custodial term (three months) given the quantum and nature of the disposal, but significant mitigating factors (mistake, disclosure by defendant, evidence that proceeds were used for estate liabilities, inability to retrieve some supporting documents due to circumstances beyond defendant's control) justified replacing imprisonment with a fine of HKD50,000 to be paid from the estate; costs awarded against the defendant with counsel's fees fixed at HKD110,000 and solicitor's fees at HKD120,000 to be paid from the estate.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 62
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Pang Zhengyun; Second Plaintiff (next Friend of Chow Po Yuen): Pang Zhengyun; Defendant; Personal Representative of the Estate of Chow Wing Cheuk: Chow Chun Kit
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2018
- Case Number
- HCMP2251/2016
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Miscellaneous Probate Proceeding; Committal for Contempt / Sentence Hearing (committal Sentencing)
- Outcome
- Contempt established; no imprisonment imposed; defendant sentenced to a fine of HKD50,000 payable from the estate; costs to be paid by the defendant from the estate with counsel fees fixed at HKD110,000 and solicitor fees fixed at HKD120,000.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Breach of Undertaking, Disclosure Obligations, Assessment of Costs, Payment From Estate
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pang Zhengyun
First Plaintiff
Pang Zhengyun
Second Plaintiff (next Friend of Chow Po Yuen)
Chow Chun Kit
Defendant; Personal Representative of the Estate of Chow Wing Cheuk
Procedural Posture
High Court Miscellaneous Probate Proceeding; Committal for Contempt / Sentence Hearing (committal Sentencing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant committed contempt by breaching the 2012 undertaking by selling estate shares
- 2 Whether the breach was deliberate or technical/mistaken
- 3 Whether the sale proceeds remained in the estate or were applied in accordance with the 2013 undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
The court found contempt established but not deliberate contumacy; the proper starting point was a custodial term (three months) given the quantum and nature of the disposal, but significant mitigating factors (mistake, disclosure by defendant, evidence that proceeds were used for estate liabilities, inability to retrieve some supporting documents due to circumstances beyond defendant's control) justified replacing imprisonment with a fine of HKD50,000 to be paid from the estate; costs awarded against the defendant with counsel's fees fixed at HKD110,000 and solicitor's fees at HKD120,000 to be paid from the estate.
Court Disposition
Contempt established; no imprisonment imposed; defendant sentenced to a fine of HKD50,000 payable from the estate; costs to be paid by the defendant from the estate with counsel fees fixed at HKD110,000 and solicitor fees fixed at HKD120,000.
Orders
- Finding of contempt for breach of the 2012 undertaking against the defendant
- Sentence: fine of HKD50,000 to be paid by the estate (no custodial sentence imposed)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment