HO LAI LEI AND ANOTHER v. MANG WAN KWAN SIMON AND ANOTHER
There was an oral agreement in 2005 under which the Parents repaid mortgage instalments and acquired a beneficial interest; that agreement gave rise to a post‑acquisition common intention constructive trust; Madam Tse was a purchaser for value with notice (constructive notice by possession and surrounding circumstances) and by June 2011 had sufficient knowledge to be fixed with liability for knowing receipt; equitable compensation in lieu of restoration was awarded to the Parents and ordered to be paid jointly and severally by Mang and Madam Tse, with indemnity obligations allocated as between them.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 527
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Ho Lai Lei; 2nd Plaintiff: Man Chap Shing; 1st Defendant: Mang Wan Kwan Simon; 2nd Defendant: Tse Yuk Chun
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2147/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action — Proprietary/equitable Claim (constructive Trust; Knowing Receipt) / Final Judgment (trial)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs: breach of constructive trust established against Mang and knowing‑receipt liability against Madam Tse; equitable compensation awarded to Plaintiffs; joint and several liability of Mang and Madam Tse; indemnity obligations against Mang
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Post Acquisition Constructive Trust, Knowing Receipt, Bona Fide Purchaser, Constructive Notice, Equitable Compensation, Indemnity, Costs and Interest
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ho Lai Lei
1st Plaintiff
Man Chap Shing
2nd Plaintiff
Mang Wan Kwan Simon
1st Defendant
Tse Yuk Chun
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action — Proprietary/equitable Claim (constructive Trust; Knowing Receipt) / Final Judgment (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an oral agreement between the Parents and Mang in 2005
- 2 Whether that oral agreement gave rise to a common intention constructive trust over the property
- 3 Whether the oral agreement was made in the presence of or with knowledge by Madam Tse
Ratio Decidendi
There was an oral agreement in 2005 under which the Parents repaid mortgage instalments and acquired a beneficial interest; that agreement gave rise to a post‑acquisition common intention constructive trust; Madam Tse was a purchaser for value with notice (constructive notice by possession and surrounding circumstances) and by June 2011 had sufficient knowledge to be fixed with liability for knowing receipt; equitable compensation in lieu of restoration was awarded to the Parents and ordered to be paid jointly and severally by Mang and Madam Tse, with indemnity obligations allocated as between them.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs: breach of constructive trust established against Mang and knowing‑receipt liability against Madam Tse; equitable compensation awarded to Plaintiffs; joint and several liability of Mang and Madam Tse; indemnity obligations against Mang
Orders
- Mang and Tse shall jointly and severally pay the sum of $1,107,670 to the Plaintiffs (the Parents)
- There shall be interest on the sum at half the judgment rate from 16 June 2015 to the date of writ, and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment