COMPETITION COMMISSION v. ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LTD AND OTHERS
The President declined to order the proposed redactions at that hearing, adjourned the confidentiality application for the Commission to provide specific evidence and/or amend the Originating Notice, waived any procedural irregularity in timing of the application, and ordered that the confidentiality ring shall include the individual respondents and the directors of corporate respondents unless the Commission adduces credible, specific evidence justifying otherwise.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCT 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; 1st Respondent: ATAL Building Services Engineering Limited; 2nd Respondent: Analogue Holdings Limited; 3rd Respondent: Shun Hing Engineering Contracting Company Limited; 4th Respondent: Shun Hing Holdings Company Limited; 5th Respondent: Ser Ka Wai; 6th Respondent: Cheng Kit Shun; 7th Respondent: Kwan Siu Kin
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2022
- Case Number
- CTEA2/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Tribunal Enforcement Action / First Case Management Conference; Pre Pleading; Confidentiality Application Adjourned
- Outcome
- Application for redaction adjourned; confidentiality ring ordered on agreed terms subject to inclusion of individual respondents and corporate directors; procedural irregularity waived
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality Orders, Confidentiality Ring, Redaction of Originating Documents, Discovery and Inspection, Witness Anonymity, Open Justice, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
ATAL Building Services Engineering Limited
1st Respondent
Analogue Holdings Limited
2nd Respondent
Shun Hing Engineering Contracting Company Limited
3rd Respondent
Shun Hing Holdings Company Limited
4th Respondent
Ser Ka Wai
5th Respondent
Cheng Kit Shun
6th Respondent
Kwan Siu Kin
7th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Competition Tribunal Enforcement Action / First Case Management Conference; Pre Pleading; Confidentiality Application Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parts of the Originating Notice should be redacted as confidential
- 2 Whether and on what terms a confidentiality ring should be ordered
- 3 Whether individual respondents and corporate directors may be excluded from confidentiality ring
Ratio Decidendi
The President declined to order the proposed redactions at that hearing, adjourned the confidentiality application for the Commission to provide specific evidence and/or amend the Originating Notice, waived any procedural irregularity in timing of the application, and ordered that the confidentiality ring shall include the individual respondents and the directors of corporate respondents unless the Commission adduces credible, specific evidence justifying otherwise.
Court Disposition
Application for redaction adjourned; confidentiality ring ordered on agreed terms subject to inclusion of individual respondents and corporate directors; procedural irregularity waived
Orders
- No redaction of the Originating Notice ordered at this hearing; application for redaction adjourned
- The confidentiality ring is ordered on the parties' agreed terms but must include the individual respondents and the directors of the corporate respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment