COMPETITION COMMISSION v. ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LTD AND OTHERS
The Tribunal directed that liability should be determined first and penalty determination adjourned pending trial or Kam Kwong settlements; consolidation requires applications in both proceedings and demonstration that cases ought to be dealt with together; the confidentiality regime must place the burden on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCT 9
- Parties
- Applicant: COMPETITION COMMISSION; 1st Respondent: ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: JOHNSON CONTROLS HONG KONG LIMITED; 3rd Respondent: YORK INTERNATIONAL (NORTHERN ASIA) LIMITED; 4th Respondent: JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC; 5th Respondent: LEE YUI MING
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2023
- Case Number
- CTEA2/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Tribunal Enforcement Action / First Case Management Conference
- Outcome
- Case management directions given: hearing fixed for Kam Kwong application; issues to be fully addressed at hearing; confidentiality directions amended; cooperation agreements and associated communications ordered discoverable; Commission to circulate draft order.
- Legal Topics
- Kam Kwong Application, Consolidation of Proceedings, Pecuniary Penalties, Confidentiality Orders, Cooperation/leniency Agreements, Sequencing of Liability and Penalty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
COMPETITION COMMISSION
Applicant
ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LIMITED
1st Respondent
JOHNSON CONTROLS HONG KONG LIMITED
2nd Respondent
YORK INTERNATIONAL (NORTHERN ASIA) LIMITED
3rd Respondent
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC
4th Respondent
LEE YUI MING
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Competition Tribunal Enforcement Action / First Case Management Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether one pecuniary penalty can be imposed across two separate proceedings
- 2 Whether consolidation may be ordered and the procedural requirement that consolidation applications be brought in both proceedings
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should determine liability first and adjourn penalty determination until after trial or after all Kam Kwong settlements
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal directed that liability should be determined first and penalty determination adjourned pending trial or Kam Kwong settlements; consolidation requires applications in both proceedings and demonstration that cases ought to be dealt with together; the confidentiality regime must place the burden on the party asserting confidentiality (adopting the respondents' proposed wording for non-confidential documents); and cooperation/leniency agreements and associated communications that resulted in successful cooperation are discoverable and not protected by without prejudice privilege.
Court Disposition
Case management directions given: hearing fixed for Kam Kwong application; issues to be fully addressed at hearing; confidentiality directions amended; cooperation agreements and associated communications ordered discoverable; Commission to circulate draft order.
Orders
- Parties to address at the 27 November 2023 hearing whether one pecuniary penalty can be imposed in two different proceedings and, if so, the matters to be taken into account in determining such a penalty
- Any application to consolidate CTEA 2/2022 and CTEA 2/2023 must be made in both proceedings and respondents in both proceedings must be afforded opportunity to make submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment