COMPETITION COMMISSION 對 FUNGS E&M ENGINEERING CO LTD 及另八人
The 9th Respondent fell within s103(2)(b): although he did not directly cause the breach he had reasonable grounds to suspect his company's conduct and failed to take steps to prevent or correct it; balancing the mitigating factors (early admission, cooperation, age, limited literacy and private company) the appropriate disqualification period is two years reduced by two months, resulting in a final order of one year ten months ending 30 August 2022.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCT 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; 1st Respondent: FUNGS E&M ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (馮氏機電工程有限公司); 2nd Respondent: YEE HING METAL SHOP (義興鐵器土木油漆工程); 3rd Respondent: CHEUNG MIN (張棉) trading as ACCORD CONSTRUCTION & DECORATION CO (雅閣建築裝修工程公司); 4th Respondent: HING SHING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (興盛建築公司); 5th Respondent: LUEN HOP DECORATION ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (聯合裝飾工程有限公司); 6th Respondent: DAO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED (陶記營造廠有限公司); 7th Respondent: WONG WAI CHUEN (黃偉銓); 8th Respondent: WONG FU SAN (黃富新); 9th Respondent: CHEUNG YUN KAM (張潤錦)
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2020
- Case Number
- CTEA1/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement Action Under the Competition Ordinance (cap 619) / Penalty/disqualification Hearing and Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Disqualification order issued against the 9th Respondent (Cheung Yun Kam) under s101 for one year and ten months, effective to 30 August 2022; partial costs award in favour of the applicant with detailed apportionment and an overall 20% reduction; interim costs directions to become final after 21 days unless varied.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Disqualification Order, Sanctions, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
FUNGS E&M ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (馮氏機電工程有限公司)
1st Respondent
YEE HING METAL SHOP (義興鐵器土木油漆工程)
2nd Respondent
CHEUNG MIN (張棉) trading as ACCORD CONSTRUCTION & DECORATION CO (雅閣建築裝修工程公司)
3rd Respondent
HING SHING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (興盛建築公司)
4th Respondent
LUEN HOP DECORATION ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (聯合裝飾工程有限公司)
5th Respondent
DAO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED (陶記營造廠有限公司)
6th Respondent
WONG WAI CHUEN (黃偉銓)
7th Respondent
WONG FU SAN (黃富新)
8th Respondent
CHEUNG YUN KAM (張潤錦)
9th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Enforcement Action Under the Competition Ordinance (cap 619) / Penalty/disqualification Hearing and Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 9th Respondent is unfit to be involved in management under s102(b) of the Competition Ordinance
- 2 Whether s103(2)(b) applies (reasonable grounds to suspect and failure to prevent)
- 3 Appropriate duration of a disqualification order under s101 and s103
Ratio Decidendi
The 9th Respondent fell within s103(2)(b): although he did not directly cause the breach he had reasonable grounds to suspect his company's conduct and failed to take steps to prevent or correct it; balancing the mitigating factors (early admission, cooperation, age, limited literacy and private company) the appropriate disqualification period is two years reduced by two months, resulting in a final order of one year ten months ending 30 August 2022.
Court Disposition
Disqualification order issued against the 9th Respondent (Cheung Yun Kam) under s101 for one year and ten months, effective to 30 August 2022; partial costs award in favour of the applicant with detailed apportionment and an overall 20% reduction; interim costs directions to become final after 21 days unless varied.
Orders
- Disqualification order under s101 prohibiting the 9th Respondent from acting as a company director, liquidator, receiver or otherwise participating in company formation or management for one year and ten months, effective to 30 August 2022.
- R9 to pay one‑ninth of the applicant's litigation costs up to and including the 13 July 2020 case management hearing, subject to the specific allowances below.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment